Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31922746›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2020

Comparing Alchemical Free Energy Estimates to Experimental Values Based on the Ben-Naim Formula: How Much Agreement Can We Expect?

T Ryan Rogers, Feng Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anion-cation contrast of small molecule solvation in salt solutions.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T Ryan RogersDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of Arkansas , Fayetteville , Arkansas 72703 , United States.
Feng WangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry , University of Arkansas , Fayetteville , Arkansas 72703 , United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2740-3534

Funding

Efficient and Accurate Force Fields for Computer-Aided Drug DesignR01GM120578 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI Feng Wang · 2017 to 2026
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The solvation free energy (SFE) plays a key role in thermodynamics. One well-established method for computing the SFE is through an alchemical transformation. However, experimental SFEs are generally determined according to the Ben-Naim equations relying on vapor pressure or density ratios. It is important to establish whether, or to what extent, typical alchemical-based free energy computations provide results comparable to experimental SFEs. In this work, we mimic experimental measurements by simulating the liquid-vapor coexistence of water without alchemical operations. The SFEs measured through vapor pressure and density ratios are used to validate the SFEs obtained through alchemical transformations. It is shown that proper consideration of the nonideal behavior of the vapor is important to ensure that the alchemical SFEs are consistent with the Ben-Naim SFEs. Alchemical transformations in the vapor phase should be performed in addition to solution phase transformations for strongly interacting solutes, such as those with low boiling temperatures and large second virial coefficients. A formula based on the virial expansion of pressure is proposed to provide a better estimate of the true SFE from the simulated vapor pressures. The proposed formula is also applicable to experimental determinations of SFE when the pressure-based route is used.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalThermodynamicsVapor PressureWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID31922746
PMCPMC7661276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.