Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31922526›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2020

ElectroPen: An ultra-low-cost, electricity-free, portable electroporator.

Gaurav Byagathvalli, Soham Sinha, Yan Zhang, Mark P Styczynski, Janet Standeven, M Saad Bhamla

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frugal Science Powered by Curiosity.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2021
    Article
  12. An ultra-low-cost electroporator with microneedle electrodes (ePatch) for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaurav ByagathvalliSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2242-6809
Soham SinhaSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8598-0543
Yan ZhangSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0719-5456
Mark P StyczynskiSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1479-6658
Janet StandevenLambert High School, Suwanee, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1256-5298
M Saad BhamlaSchool of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9788-9920
Georgia Institute of Technology · US

Funding

Synthetic biology-based detection of micronutrients with minimal equipmentR01EB022592 · NIBIB · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI STYCZYNSKI, MARK PHILIP-WALTER · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroporation is a basic yet powerful method for delivering small molecules (RNA, DNA, drugs) across cell membranes by application of an electrical field. It is used for many diverse applications, from genetically engineering cells to drug- and DNA-based vaccine delivery. Despite this broad utility, the high cost of electroporators can keep this approach out of reach for many budget-conscious laboratories. To address this need, we develop a simple, inexpensive, and handheld electroporator inspired by and derived from a common household piezoelectric stove lighter. The proposed "ElectroPen" device can cost as little as 23 cents (US dollars) to manufacture, is portable (weighs 13 g and requires no electricity), can be easily fabricated using 3D printing, and delivers repeatable exponentially decaying pulses of about 2,000 V in 5 ms. We provide a proof-of-concept demonstration by genetically transforming plasmids into Escherichia coli cells, showing transformation efficiency comparable to commercial devices, but at a fraction of the cost. We also demonstrate the potential for rapid dissemination of this approach, with multiple research groups across the globe validating the ease of construction and functionality of our device, supporting the potential for democratization of science through frugal tools. Thus, the simplicity, accessibility, and affordability of our device holds potential for making modern synthetic biology accessible in high school, community, and resource-poor laboratories.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisElectricityElectroporationEquipment DesignEscherichia coliGene Transfer TechniquesHumansLaboratoriesManufactured MaterialsPoverty AreasPrinting, Three-DimensionalTransformation, BacterialTransportation

Identifiers

PMID31922526
PMCPMC6953602
OpenAlexW2999294984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.