Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31922455›Full record

ReviewInternational review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England)2020

Suicide in the pediatric population: screening, risk assessment and treatment.

Mary F Cwik, Victoria M O'Keefe, Emily E Haroz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International review of psychiatry (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Safety Planning for Youth in the Emergency Department Who Have Suicide Risk.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Mental pain and lifetime suicide attempts in early adolescence: a preliminary study.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mary F CwikDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Victoria M O'KeefeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Emily E HarozDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

SuSt-AInS: Sustainment of suicide prevention programs in American Indian SettingsK01MH116335 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HAROZ, EMILY · 2018 to 2022
$733k
NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH116335
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of children and adolescents dying by suicide is increasing over time. Patterns for who is at risk are also changing, leading to a need to review clinical suicide prevention progress and identify limitations with existing practices and research that can help us further address this growing problem. This paper aims to synthesise the literature on paediatric suicide screening, risk assessment and treatment to inform clinical practice and suicide prevention efforts. Our review shows that universal screening is strongly recommended, feasible and acceptable, and that there are screening tools that have been validated with youth. However, screening may not accurately identify those at risk of dying due to the relative rarity of suicide death and the associated research and clinical challenges in studying such a rare event and predicting future behaviour. Similarly, while risk assessments have been developed and tested in some populations, there is limited research on their validity and challenges with their implementation. Several promising suicide-specific treatments have been developed for youth, but overall there is an insufficient number of randomised trials. Despite great need, the research evidence to support screening, risk assessment and treatment is still limited. As suicide rates increase for children and adolescents, continued research in all three domains is needed to reverse this trend.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentSuicideSuicide PreventionAdolescentChildHumanspaediatricrisk assessmentscreeningSuicidetreatment

Identifiers

PMID31922455
PMCPMC7190447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.