Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31922447›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2020

Moving beyond project-specific patient and public involvement in research.

Grace Turner, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi, Gary Price, Magdalena Skrybant, Melanie Calvert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Consortium-Based Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement for Long COVID Research: A Pirit-Focused Impact Evaluation of the PHOSP-COVID Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Public involvement in chronic respiratory diseases research: A qualitative study of patients', carers' and citizens' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Research Buddy partnership in a MD-PhD program: lessons learned.Research involvement and engagement · 2023
    Article
  13. Patient-centred clinical trial design.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Grace TurnerCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK.
Olalekan Lee AiyegbusiCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9122-8251
Gary PriceCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK.
Magdalena SkrybantInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK.
Melanie CalvertCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2 TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Health Services ResearchResearch PersonnelStakeholder ParticipationCommunity ParticipationDecision Making, SharedHumansIntersectoral CollaborationModels, OrganizationalPatient ParticipationQuality ControlResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID31922447
PMCPMC6961168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.