Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31922082›Full record

ArticleVideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy2020

EUS-guided stent removal in buried lumen-apposing metal stent syndrome: a case series.

Julia Biedermann, Sebastian Zeissig, Stefan Brückner, Jochen Hampe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Buried lumen-apposing metal stent following EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy: a rare adverse event and its management.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The Lambda stenting technique: a new approach to address EUS-guided biliary drainage-associated adverse events.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2024
    Review
  7. An expensive gastric piercing: an embedded lumen-apposing metal stent.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Drainage in the Management of Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Partial Pancreatectomy.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia BiedermannMedical Department 1, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Sebastian ZeissigMedical Department 1, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Stefan BrücknerMedical Department 1, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jochen HampeMedical Department 1, University Hospital Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsLumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) play an increasing role in transgastric and transduodenal drainage of pancreatic fluid collections and allow novel EUS-guided interventions. Alongside the main adverse events of bleeding and occlusion, LAMSs can be overgrown by mucosa, which leads to the inability to visualize the stent in endoscopy.

methodsWe describe a series of 4 cases of buried LAMSs that were removed under EUS guidance for identification of the stent followed by removal with rat-tooth forceps.

resultsThe median in situ time of the LAMSs in the reported 4 cases was 53 days. All stents could no longer be visualized endoscopically when drainage of necrosis was complete. All 4 buried LAMSs could be identified by EUS and were removed successfully with forceps. In 1 case, balloon dilation of the stent tract was performed before stent removal. No adverse events were observed after the procedure.

conclusionsBuried stent syndrome is a rare adverse event of LAMSs. Here we describe a safe and effective approach for stent identification and removal without prior mucosal dissection.

Indexed as

LAMS, lumen-apposing metal stentPFC, pancreatic fluid collectionWON, walled-off necrosis

Identifiers

PMID31922082
PMCPMC6945230
OpenAlexW2981862163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.