ArticleAIMS genetics2019
Evidence for novel epigenetic marks within plants.
Article in AIMS genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gene regulatory mechanisms downstream of DNA methylation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- DNA methylation in wheat: current understanding and future potential for enhancing biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024Review
- β-Aminobutyric acid promotes stress tolerance, physiological adjustments, as well as broad epigenetic changes at DNA and RNA nucleobases in field elms (Ulmus minor).BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Superoxide signalling and antioxidant processing in the plant nucleus.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Review
- The ascorbate-glutathione cycle coming of age.Journal of experimental botany · 2024Review
- Exploring the crop epigenome: a comparison of DNA methylation profiling techniques.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
- Article
- Plant DNA Methylation: An Epigenetic Mark in Development, Environmental Interactions, and Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- CRISPR-Cas-mediated transcriptional control and epi-mutagenesis.Plant physiology · 2022Review
- Decoding the sorghum methylome: understanding epigenetic contributions to agronomic traits.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022Article
- Epigenetic features improve TALE target prediction.BMC genomics · 2021Article
- 2-oxoglutarate-dependent dioxygenases: A renaissance in attention for ascorbic acid in plants.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Variation in patterns of gene expression can result from modifications in the genome that occur without a change in the sequence of the DNA; such modifications include methylation of cytosine to generate 5-methylcytosine (5mC) resulting in the generation of heritable epimutation and novel epialleles. This type of non-sequence variation is called epigenetics. The enzymes responsible for generation of such DNA modifications in mammals are named DNA methyltransferases (DNMT) including DNMT1, DNMT2 and DNMT3. The later stages of oxidations to these modifications are catalyzed by Ten Eleven Translocation (TET) proteins, which contain catalytic domains belonging to the 2-oxoglutarate dependent dioxygenase family. In various mammalian cells/tissues including embryonic stem cells, cancer cells and brain tissues, it has been confirmed that these proteins are able to induce the stepwise oxidization of 5-methyl cytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), 5-formylcytosine (5fC), and finally 5-carboxylcytosine (5caC). Each stage from initial methylation until the end of the DNA demethylation process is considered as a specific epigenetic mark that may regulate gene expression. This review discusses controversial evidence for the presence of such oxidative products, particularly 5hmC, in various plant species. Whereas some reports suggest no evidence for enzymatic DNA demethylation, other reports suggest that the presence of oxidative products is followed by the active demethylation and indicate the contribution of possible TET-like proteins in the regulation of gene expression in plants. The review also summarizes the results obtained by expressing the human TET conserved catalytic domain in transgenic plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.