ArticleTrauma case reports2020
Lazarus phenomenon in trauma.
Article in Trauma case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Lazarus Phenomenon Among Older People-A Descriptive Analysis of Cases Spanning over 40 Years.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Lazarus Phenomenon or the Return from the Afterlife-What We Know about Auto Resuscitation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Delayed Presentation of Spontaneous Shockable Rhythm After Death: Another Subtype of Lazarus Phenomenon?Journal of Korean medical science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lazarus phenomenon embodies auto-resuscitation, aka the return of spontaneous circulation following termination of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Limited or no literature exists that describes auto-resuscitation in trauma. In the current report, we describe a case of an older woman that presented with poly-traumatic injuries following a motor vehicle collision. The aggressive resuscitation efforts failed, and the patient witnessed a pulseless electrical activity; however, nine-minutes after cessation of resuscitation efforts, the patient experienced auto-resuscitation. In addition to the sequel of events following the presentation, the report highlights the management dilemma and ethical implications relating to the observation period for auto-resuscitation in cases of donation after circulatory death, where the urgency to harvest the organs to ensure maximum viability is in direct opposition to ensuring enough time has elapsed to rule out auto-resuscitation. Guidelines on an appropriate period for observation in auto-resuscitation patients queued for organ donation are warranted, keeping in lieu viability of organs following death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.