Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921914›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2019

Bluetongue Disease Control in Northern Ireland During 2017 and 2018.

Anastasia Georgaki, Archie Murchie, Ignatius McKeown, David Mercer, Sarah Millington, William Thurston, Karen Burns, Ben Cunningham, Valerie Harkin, Fraser Menzies

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasia GeorgakiVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Archie MurchieSustainable Agri-Food Sciences Division, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Ignatius McKeownTrade, Epizootics and Official Controls Division, Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs, Belfast, United Kingdom.
David MercerNewtownards Divisional Veterinary Office, Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Sarah MillingtonAtmospheric Dispersion and Air Quality, Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom.
William ThurstonAtmospheric Dispersion and Air Quality, Met Office, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Karen BurnsVeterinary Sciences Division, Department of Virology, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Ben CunninghamVeterinary Sciences Division, Department of Virology, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Valerie HarkinVeterinary Sciences Division, Department of Virology, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Fraser MenziesVeterinary Epidemiology Unit, Department of Agriculture Environment and Rural Affairs, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Agri Food and Biosciences Institute · GBMet Office · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the emergence of bluetongue virus in central and northern Europe in 2006, Northern Ireland's (NI) surveillance programme has evolved to include the use of risk assessments and simulation models to monitor the risk of bluetongue incursion. Livestock production is of high economic importance to NI as it exports approximately 75% of its agricultural produce. Its surveillance programme is designed to enable effective mitigation measures to be identified to minimize disease risk, and to provide additional assurances to protect NI's export markets in the European Union (EU) and third countries. Active surveillance employs an atmospheric dispersion model to assess the likelihood of wind-borne midge transfer from Great Britain (GB) to NI and to identify high risk areas. In these areas, the number of cattle tested for bluetongue is proportionally increased. Targeted surveillance is directed to ruminants imported from restricted countries and regions at risk of bluetongue. Targeted surveillance on high risk imports assists in early detection of disease as, despite all controls and preventive measures, legally imported animals may still carry the virus. In November 2018, a bluetongue-positive heifer was imported into NI. A case specific risk assessment was commissioned to estimate the likelihood of spread of bluetongue as a result of this incursion. November is the tail end of the midges' active period and therefore there was considerable uncertainty pertaining to the survival of midges inside a cattle shed and the potential for incubation of the virus in the vectors. An evidenced-based approach was adopted where temperature and midge abundance was monitored in order to minimize uncertainty and give an accurate estimate of the likelihood of virus spread to other animals following the arrival of the positive heifer. The heifer was destroyed and the evidence indicated that the risk of successful completion of the extrinsic cycle within the local midge population was negligible. This paper describes NI's surveillance programme between January 2017 and December 2018 and the case of a positive imported animal into the country. The importance of effective surveillance in early detection of threats and the usefulness of risk assessments is highlighted through the case study.

Indexed as

bluetongueCulicoidesmidgesNorthern Irelandrisk assessmentsurveillancewind-borne

Identifiers

PMID31921914
PMCPMC6928110
OpenAlexW2993445753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.