Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921515›Full record

ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2020

Gene mutational analysis by NGS and its clinical significance in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.

Jifeng Yu, Yingmei Li, Tao Li, Yafei Li, Haizhou Xing, Hui Sun, Ling Sun, Dingming Wan, Yanfang Liu, Xinsheng Xie and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Prognostic impact ofTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jifeng YuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.ORCID 0000-0003-1217-4385
Yingmei LiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Tao LiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Yafei LiDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Haizhou XingDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Hui SunDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Ling SunDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Dingming WanDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Yanfang LiuDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Xinsheng XieDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
Zhongxing JiangDepartment of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, 1 East Jianshe Road, Zhengzhou, 450052 China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn this study, we retrospectively summarized the differences of molecular gene mutations between MDS and AML patients, as well as the young and older age groups of MDS and AML patients. We also analyzed the response of newly diagnosed AML patients to standard DA or IA induction chemotherapy and the relationship between the chemotherapy outcome and the frequency of different gene mutation abnormalities.

methodsNGS assay covering 43 genes was studied in 93 de novo MDS and 325 non-M3 AML patients. Bone marrow samples from all patients underwent gene mutational analysis by NGS.

resultsAt least one non-synonymous gene mutation was detected in 279 AML patients (85.8%) and 85 MDS patients (91.4%). Contrary to 59 years and younger AML patients, there was a significantly higher incidence of gene mutation in 60 years and older AML patients (2.37 vs 1.94, p = 0.034). Gene mutation incidence in 60 years and older MDS patients increased, but no statistical significance was present (1.95 vs 1.64, p = 0.216). AML patients had a significantly higher gene mutation incidence compared with MDS-MLD patients (2.02 vs 1.63, p = 0.046). Gene mutation incidence was higher in patients with MDS-EB1/EB2 compared with patients with MDS-MLD but there was no statistical significance present (2.14 vs 1.63, p = 0.081). AML patients had significantly higher incidences of CEBPA, FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, NPM1 and IDH1/2 gene mutations (p = 0.0043, 0.000, 0.030962, 0.002752, and 0.000628, respectively) and a lower incidence of TET2 and U2AF1 gene mutations (p = 0.000004 and 0.000, respectively) compared with MDS patients. Among the individual genes in different age groups, there were significantly higher incidences of RUNX1, IDH2, TP53 and SF3B1 gene mutations (p = 0.0478, 0.0028, 0.0024 and 0.005, respectively) as well as a trend of higher ASXL gene mutation (p = 0.057) in 60 years and older AML patients compared to 59 years and younger patients. There was no statistically significant difference in MDS patients with the different age groups and among the individual genes. Between AML patients and MDS patients among the different gene functional groups, AML patients had a significantly higher incidence of transcriptional deregulation (27.4% vs 15.1%, p = 0.014963), activated signalling (36.3% vs 10.8%, p = 0.000002) related gene mutations as well as a significantly lower incidence of RNA spliceosome (6.15% vs 60.1%, p = 0.000) related gene mutations. Furthermore, among the patients who received either IA or DA regimen for induction chemotherapy, patients with IA regimen had a significantly better CR rate than those with DA regimen (76.6% vs 57.1%, p = 0.0228).

conclusionsDifferent gene mutations had been found in majority of MDS and AML patients. MDS and AML patients had different gene mutation patterns. AML patients with fewer or no gene mutations had a better chance of achieving CR when treated with IA and DA regimen induction chemotherapy.

Indexed as

Acute myeloid leukemiaClinical outcomeGene mutationInduction chemotherapyMyelodysplastic syndromeNext generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID31921515
PMCPMC6945703
OpenAlexW3000594265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.