ArticleExperimental hematology & oncology2020
Gene mutational analysis by NGS and its clinical significance in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia.
Article in Experimental hematology & oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical implications of variant allele frequencies of genes in patients with acute myeloid leukemia.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Genetic Mosaic of Pediatric AML: Insights from Southwest China.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Preparation of robust synthetic control samples and their use in a metatranscriptomic clinical test.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Prognostic Significance of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index in Patients with de Novo non‑M3 Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Serum albumin is associated with the inherent property of acute myeloid leukemia and correlates with patient outcomes.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2024Article
- Prognostic mutation signature would serve as a potential prognostic predictor in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm-like immunophenotype is negatively associated with CEBPA bZIP mutation and predicts unfavorable prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- U2AF1 in various neoplastic diseases and relevant targeted therapies for malignant cancers with complex mutations (Review).Oncology reports · 2024Review
- Prognostic impact ofTherapeutic advances in hematology · 2024Article
- Prognostic significance of ASXL1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Caspian journal of internal medicine · 2024Review
- Rare single-nucleotide variants of MLH1 and MSH2 genes in patients with Lynch syndrome.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- The role of alternative pre-mRNA splicing in cancer progression.Cancer cell international · 2023Review
- From KIT-mutated into wild-type: dedifferentiation of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in adolescent patient-a case report.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- Usefulness of New Neutrophil-Related Hematologic Parameters in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndrome.Cancers · 2023Article
- Gene mutation analysis using next-generation sequencing and its clinical significance in patients with myeloid neoplasm: A multi-center study from China.Cancer medicine · 2023Article
- An Updated Overview of the Role of CYP450 during Xenobiotic Metabolization in Regulating the Acute Myeloid Leukemia Microenvironment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Next-generation sequencing revealed factors associated with cumulative incidence of relapse and leukemia-free survival in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.Cancer pathogenesis and therapy · 2023Article
- Downregulation of SMIM3 inhibits growth of leukemia via PI3K-AKT signaling pathway and correlates with prognosis of adult acute myeloid leukemia with normal karyotype.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Post-remission measurable residual disease directs treatment choice and improves outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk acute myeloid leukemia in CR1.International journal of hematology · 2022Article
- [Clinical features and survival analysis in non-M(3) acute myeloid leukemia patients with ASXL1 gene mutation].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn this study, we retrospectively summarized the differences of molecular gene mutations between MDS and AML patients, as well as the young and older age groups of MDS and AML patients. We also analyzed the response of newly diagnosed AML patients to standard DA or IA induction chemotherapy and the relationship between the chemotherapy outcome and the frequency of different gene mutation abnormalities.
methodsNGS assay covering 43 genes was studied in 93 de novo MDS and 325 non-M3 AML patients. Bone marrow samples from all patients underwent gene mutational analysis by NGS.
resultsAt least one non-synonymous gene mutation was detected in 279 AML patients (85.8%) and 85 MDS patients (91.4%). Contrary to 59 years and younger AML patients, there was a significantly higher incidence of gene mutation in 60 years and older AML patients (2.37 vs 1.94, p = 0.034). Gene mutation incidence in 60 years and older MDS patients increased, but no statistical significance was present (1.95 vs 1.64, p = 0.216). AML patients had a significantly higher gene mutation incidence compared with MDS-MLD patients (2.02 vs 1.63, p = 0.046). Gene mutation incidence was higher in patients with MDS-EB1/EB2 compared with patients with MDS-MLD but there was no statistical significance present (2.14 vs 1.63, p = 0.081). AML patients had significantly higher incidences of CEBPA, FLT3-ITD, DNMT3A, NPM1 and IDH1/2 gene mutations (p = 0.0043, 0.000, 0.030962, 0.002752, and 0.000628, respectively) and a lower incidence of TET2 and U2AF1 gene mutations (p = 0.000004 and 0.000, respectively) compared with MDS patients. Among the individual genes in different age groups, there were significantly higher incidences of RUNX1, IDH2, TP53 and SF3B1 gene mutations (p = 0.0478, 0.0028, 0.0024 and 0.005, respectively) as well as a trend of higher ASXL gene mutation (p = 0.057) in 60 years and older AML patients compared to 59 years and younger patients. There was no statistically significant difference in MDS patients with the different age groups and among the individual genes. Between AML patients and MDS patients among the different gene functional groups, AML patients had a significantly higher incidence of transcriptional deregulation (27.4% vs 15.1%, p = 0.014963), activated signalling (36.3% vs 10.8%, p = 0.000002) related gene mutations as well as a significantly lower incidence of RNA spliceosome (6.15% vs 60.1%, p = 0.000) related gene mutations. Furthermore, among the patients who received either IA or DA regimen for induction chemotherapy, patients with IA regimen had a significantly better CR rate than those with DA regimen (76.6% vs 57.1%, p = 0.0228).
conclusionsDifferent gene mutations had been found in majority of MDS and AML patients. MDS and AML patients had different gene mutation patterns. AML patients with fewer or no gene mutations had a better chance of achieving CR when treated with IA and DA regimen induction chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.