ArticleJournal of pathology informatics2019
Whole-Slide Image Focus Quality: Automatic Assessment and Impact on AI Cancer Detection.
Article in Journal of pathology informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Best Practice Recommendations for the Implementation of a Digital Pathology Workflow in the Anatomic Pathology Laboratory by the European Society of Digital and Integrative Pathology (ESDIP).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Guideline
- Deployment of AI-driven automated quality control of whole-slide images in a large tertiary cancer center.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Comparison and image analysis of different file formats on whole-slide images for colorectal and non-small cell lung carcinomas.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Article
- Digital pathology imaging artificial intelligence in cancer research and clinical trials: An NCI workshop report.Journal of pathology informatics · 2026Review
- Evaluating the robustness of slide-level AI predictions on out-of-focus whole slide images: A retrospective observational study.Journal of pathology informatics · 2025Article
- A mixture of experts (MoE) model to improve AI-based computational pathology prediction performance under variable levels of image blur.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Use of quality checks and processes across digital histopathology: an initial survey from the Bigpicture consortium.Journal of clinical pathology · 2025Article
- Lossy DICOM conversion may affect AI performance.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Powered Quality Assurance: Transforming Diagnostics, Surgery, and Patient Care-Innovations, Limitations, and Future Directions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Equipping computational pathology systems with artifact processing pipelines: a showcase for computation and performance trade-offs.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Artificial Intelligence in pathology: current applications, limitations, and future directions.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Review
- Robust autofocus method based on patterned active illumination and image cross-correlation analysis.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Synergies and Challenges in the Preclinical and Clinical Implementation of Pathology Artificial Intelligence Applications.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2023Review
- Pitfalls in machine learning-based assessment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: A report of the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast CancerThe Journal of pathology · 2023Review
- Automatic identification of medically important mosquitoes using embedded learning approach-based image-retrieval system.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Automatic detection of circulating tumor cells and cancer associated fibroblasts using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Companion diagnostic requirements for spatial biology using multiplex immunofluorescence and multispectral imaging.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Comparative effects of hepatocyte growth factor and tacrolimus on acute liver allograft early tolerance.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- White blood cell detection, classification and analysis using phase imaging with computational specificity (PICS).Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Conditional generation of medical time series for extrapolation to underrepresented populations.PLOS digital health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital pathology enables remote access or consults and powerful image analysis algorithms. However, the slide digitization process can create artifacts such as out-of-focus (OOF). OOF is often only detected on careful review, potentially causing rescanning, and workflow delays. Although scan time operator screening for whole-slide OOF is feasible, manual screening for OOF affecting only parts of a slide is impractical.
methodsWe developed a convolutional neural network (ConvFocus) to exhaustively localize and quantify the severity of OOF regions on digitized slides. ConvFocus was developed using our refined semi-synthetic OOF data generation process and evaluated using seven slides spanning three different tissue and three different stain types, each of which were digitized using two different whole-slide scanner models ConvFocus's predictions were compared with pathologist-annotated focus quality grades across 514 distinct regions representing 37,700 35 μm × 35 μm image patches, and 21 digitized "z-stack" WSIs that contain known OOF patterns.
resultsWhen compared to pathologist-graded focus quality, ConvFocus achieved Spearman rank coefficients of 0.81 and 0.94 on two scanners and reproduced the expected OOF patterns from z-stack scanning. We also evaluated the impact of OOF on the accuracy of a state-of-the-art metastatic breast cancer detector and saw a consistent decrease in performance with increasing OOF.
conclusionsComprehensive whole-slide OOF categorization could enable rescans before pathologist review, potentially reducing the impact of digitization focus issues on the clinical workflow. We show that the algorithm trained on our semi-synthetic OOF data generalizes well to real OOF regions across tissue types, stains, and scanners. Finally, quantitative OOF maps can flag regions that might otherwise be misclassified by image analysis algorithms, preventing OOF-induced errors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.