Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921432›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2019

Scoring systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity with simple, rapid outcome measures.

Aikaterini Thanou, Judith A James, Cristina Arriens, Teresa Aberle, Eliza Chakravarty, Joseph Rawdon, Stavros Stavrakis, Joan T Merrill, Anca Askanase

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02270957 (Clarification of Abatacept Effects in SLE With Integrated Biologic and Clinical Approaches), which is not on this map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02270957 phase2completednot on this map

Clarification of Abatacept Effects in SLE With Integrated Biologic and Clinical Approaches (The ABC Study)

TypeinterventionalSponsorOklahoma Medical Research FoundationRan2014 to 2021Enrolled66ConditionsSystemic Lupus ErythematosusArmsAbatacept, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Updates on the Evaluation of Lupus Arthritis.Rheumatology and therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. What's new in the assessment of lupus activity?Rheumatology advances in practice · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Aikaterini ThanouArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1161-7618
Judith A JamesArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Cristina ArriensArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-1664
Teresa AberleArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Eliza ChakravartyArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Joseph RawdonArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Stavros StavrakisDepartment of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Joan T MerrillArthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.
Anca AskanaseDepartment of Rheumatology, Columbia University, New York City, New York, USA.

Funding

Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM104938 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI JENNIFER DAVID PECK · 2013 to 2026
$68.2M
Oklahoma Rheumatic Disease Research Cores Center (Overall Application)P30AR073750 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Joel Marvin Guthridge · 2018 to 2026
$8.5M
SNP Confirmation and High Throughput Genotyping CoreP30AR053483 · NIAMS · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI CHAKRAVARTY, ELIZA F · 2007 to 2017
$6.7M
Pre-Clinical Studies to Identify SLE Therapeutic TargetsU19AI082714 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JAMES, JUDITH A · 2009 to 2018
$6.2M
Oklahoma ACE: Molecular Destruction of Autoimmune Disease to Aid Clinical Trail SuccessUM1AI144292 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI JUDITH A JAMES · 2019 to 2026
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082714NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI144292NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR053483NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR073750NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveExisting methods for grading lupus flares or improvement require definition-based thresholds as increments of change. Visual analogue scales (VAS) allow rapid, continuous scaling of disease severity. We analysed the performance of the SELENA SLEDAI Physician's Global Assessment (SSPGA) and the Lupus Foundation of America-Rapid Evaluation of Activity in Lupus (LFA-REAL) as measures of improvement or worsening in SLE.

methodsWe evaluated the agreement between prospectively collected measures of lupus disease activity [SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index 2004 (BILAG 2004), Cutaneous Lupus Area and Severity Index (CLASI), SSPGA and LFA-REAL] and response [(SLE Responder Index (SRI)-4 and BILAG-Based Combined Lupus Assessment (BICLA)] in a clinical trial.

resultsFifty patients (47 females, mean age 45 (±11.6) years) were assessed at 528 consecutive visits (average 10.6 (±4.1) visits/patient). Changes in disease activity compared with baseline were examined in 478 visit pairs. SSPGA and LFA-REAL correlated with each other (r=0.936), and with SLEDAI and BILAG (SSPGA: r=0.742 (SLEDAI), r=0.776 (BILAG); LFA-REAL: r=0.778 (SLEDAI), r=0.813 (BILAG); all p<0.0001). Changes (∆) in SSPGA and LFA-REAL compared with screening correlated with each other (r=0.857) and with changes in SLEDAI and BILAG (∆SSPGA: r=0.678 (∆SLEDAI), r=0.624 (∆BILAG); ∆LFA-REAL: r=0.686 (∆SLEDAI) and 0.700 (∆BILAG); all p<0.0001). Changes in SSPGA and LFA-REAL strongly correlated with SRI-4 and BICLA by receiver operating characteristic analysis (p<0.0001 for all). Additionally, LFA-REAL correlated to individual BILAG organ scores (musculoskeletal: r=0.842, mucocutaneous: r=0.826 (p<0.0001 for both)).

conclusionSSPGA and LFA-REAL are reliable surrogates of common SLE trial end points and could be used as continuous or dichotomous response measures. Additionally, LFA-REAL can provide individualised scoring at the symptom or organ level. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02270957.

Indexed as

disease activityoutcomes researchsystemic lupus Erythematosus

Identifiers

PMID31921432
PMCPMC6937422

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.