Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921338›Full record

ArticleEcancermedicalscience2019

Complete metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-score matched by the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic model.

Aline F Fares, Daniel V Araujo, Vinicius Calsavara, Augusto Obuti Saito, Maria Nirvana Formiga, Aldo A Dettino, Stenio Zequi, Walter H da Costa, Isabela W Cunha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Metastatic Lesion of the Tibia from Renal Cell Carcinoma.Case reports in oncological medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline F FaresDepartment of Medical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Daniel V AraujoDepartment of Medical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Vinicius CalsavaraDepartment of Epidemiology and Statistics, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Augusto Obuti SaitoDepartment of Medical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Maria Nirvana FormigaDepartment of Medical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Aldo A DettinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Stenio ZequiDepartment of Urology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Walter H da CostaDepartment of Urology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
Isabela W CunhaDepartment of Pathology, AC Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01525-001, Brazil.
AC Camargo Hospital · BRUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe evaluated overall survival (OS) benefit of complete metastasectomy (CM) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) using a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis to balance groups by age, gender and by the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic model (IMDC).

methodsWe included patients (pts) treated at the AC Camargo Cancer Center between 2007 and 2016. Pairs were matched by age, gender and IMDC. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate OS on CM and no-CM group.

resultsWe found 116 pts with clear cell mRCC. After PSM, the number was reduced to 74 (37 CM, 37 no-CM). The median OS for CM and no-CM was 98.3 months and 40.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio 0.24 95%CI 0.11-0.53 p < 0.001). The OS benefit of CM was confirmed on favourable and intermediate IMDC but was absent on poor IMDC. The CM group received less systemic therapy than the no-CM group. Ten pts in the CM group still have no evidence of disease (NED).

conclusionAfter matching for age, gender and IMDC, we found CM impacts on OS and also diminishes the need for systemic treatment. Survival benefit was confirmed for favourable/intermediate IMDC but not for the poor IMDC prognostic model. Further studies correlating IMDC and metastasectomy are needed to guide clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

clear cell renal cell carcinomametastasectomypropensity score matchingtargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID31921338
PMCPMC6834380
OpenAlexW2980206217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.