Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921329›Full record

GuidelineWorld journal of emergency surgery : WJES2020

Perforated and bleeding peptic ulcer: WSES guidelines.

Antonio Tarasconi, Federico Coccolini, Walter L Biffl, Matteo Tomasoni, Luca Ansaloni, Edoardo Picetti, Sarah Molfino, Vishal Shelat, Stefania Cimbanassi, Dieter G Weber and 21 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in World journal of emergency surgery : WJES, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06484699 (Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer in Sohag), which is not on this map. Cited by 156 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
156citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
38.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06484699 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Open Versus Laparoscopic Repair of Perforated Peptic Ulcer in Sohag

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsPerforated Peptic UlcerArmsopen repair of perforated peptic ulcer, laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

156 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 339 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Robotic surgery in emergency setting: 2021 WSES position paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2022
    Pooled it
  8. Inguinoscrotal hernias containing stomach: risk of emergency presentation.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Pooled it
  9. Guideline
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

96 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Antonio Tarasconi1Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6588-2268
Federico Coccolini2General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Walter L Biffl3Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA USA.
Matteo Tomasoni4General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Luca Ansaloni4General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery Department, Bufalini hospital, Cesena, Italy.
Edoardo Picetti5Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Sarah Molfino6Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Vishal Shelat7Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Stefania Cimbanassi8General Surgery and Trauma Team, ASST Niguarda Milano, University of Milano, Milan, Italy.
Dieter G Weber9Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia & The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Fikri M Abu-Zidan10Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, UAE University, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates.
Fabio C CampanileDivision of Surgery, ASL VT - Ospedale "Andosilla", Civita Castellana, Italy.
Salomone Di Saverio12Cambridge Colorectal Unit, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Gian Luca Baiocchi6Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Claudio Casella13Department of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Michael D KellyDepartment of General Surgery, Albury Hospital, Albury, Australia.
Andrew W Kirkpatrick15General, Acute Care, Abdominal Wall Reconstruction, and Trauma Surgery, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta Canada.
Ari Leppaniemi16Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Ernest E Moore17Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, Denver, CO USA.
Andrew Peitzman18University of Pittsburgh, School of Medicine, UPMC - Presbyterian, Pittsburgh, PA USA.
Gustavo Pereira Fraga19Division of Trauma Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, SP Brazil.
Marco Ceresoli20Department of General and Emergency Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.
Ronald V Maier21Department of Surgery, Harborview Medical Centre, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Imtaz Wani22Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India.
Vittoria Pattonieri1Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
Gennaro Perrone1Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
George Velmahos23Trauma, Emergency Surgery and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Michael SugrueLetterkenny University Hospital, Donegal Clinical Research Academy Centre for Personalized Medicine, Donegal, Ireland.
Massimo SartelliDepartment of Surgery, Macerata Hospital, Macerata, Italy.
Yoram Kluger26Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel.
Fausto Catena1Emergency Surgery Department, Parma University Hospital, Parma, Italy.
University of Parma · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITOspedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena · ITAlbury Wodonga Health · AUCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBDenver Health Medical Center · USFoothills Medical Centre · CAHelsinki University Hospital · FILetterkenny University Hospital · IEMassachusetts General Hospital · USOspedale di Civita Castellana · ITOspedale di MacerataRambam Health Care Campus · ILScripps Memorial Hospital · USSher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences · INTan Tock Seng Hospital · SGThe University of Western Australia · AUUnited Arab Emirates University · AEUniversidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peptic ulcer disease is common with a lifetime prevalence in the general population of 5-10% and an incidence of 0.1-0.3% per year. Despite a sharp reduction in incidence and rates of hospital admission and mortality over the past 30 years, complications are still encountered in 10-20% of these patients. Peptic ulcer disease remains a significant healthcare problem, which can consume considerable financial resources. Management may involve various subspecialties including surgeons, gastroenterologists, and radiologists. Successful management of patients with complicated peptic ulcer (CPU) involves prompt recognition, resuscitation when required, appropriate antibiotic therapy, and timely surgical/radiological treatment. Methods: The present guidelines have been developed according to the GRADE methodology. To create these guidelines, a panel of experts was designed and charged by the board of the WSES to perform a systematic review of the available literature and to provide evidence-based statements with immediate practical application. All the statements were presented and discussed during the 5th WSES Congress, and for each statement, a consensus among the WSES panel of experts was reached. Conclusions: The population considered in these guidelines is adult patients with suspected complicated peptic ulcer disease. These guidelines present evidence-based international consensus statements on the management of complicated peptic ulcer from a collaboration of a panel of experts and are intended to improve the knowledge and the awareness of physicians around the world on this specific topic. We divided our work into the two main topics, bleeding and perforated peptic ulcer, and structured it into six main topics that cover the entire management process of patients with complicated peptic ulcer, from diagnosis at ED arrival to post-discharge antimicrobial therapy, to provide an up-to-date, easy-to-use tool that can help physicians and surgeons during the decision-making process.

Indexed as

AdultCombined Modality TherapyEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPeptic Ulcer HemorrhagePeptic Ulcer PerforationAngiographyAntibioticsDiagnosisEmbolizationGuidelinesHigh-risk patientsIntra-abdominal infectionNon-operative managementPancreatitisPeptic ulcerPeritonitisSurgeryTechniqueTiming

Identifiers

PMID31921329
PMCPMC6947898
OpenAlexW3000269369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.