Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921302›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2019

Diagnostic Yield of Next-Generation Sequencing in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown Etiology.

Amber de Haan, Mark Eijgelsheim, Liffert Vogt, Nine V A M Knoers, Martin H de Borst

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrated multiomic analyses: An approach to improve understanding of diabetic kidney disease.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Leveraging clinical intuition to improve accuracy of phenotype-driven prioritization.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genetic diagnosis for adult patients at a genetic clinic.Cold Spring Harbor molecular case studies · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Genetic testing in the diagnosis of chronic kidney disease: recommendations for clinical practice.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amber de HaanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Mark EijgelsheimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Liffert VogtSection Nephrology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Nine V A M KnoersDepartment of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Martin H de BorstDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
University of Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques, including whole exome sequencing, have facilitated cost-effective sequencing of large regions of the genome, enabling the implementation of NGS in clinical practice. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a major contributor to global burden of disease and is associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. CKD can be caused by a wide variety of primary renal disorders. In about one in five CKD patients, no primary renal disease diagnosis can be established. Moreover, recent studies indicate that the clinical diagnosis may be incorrect in a substantial number of patients. Both the absence of a diagnosis or an incorrect diagnosis can have therapeutic implications. Genetic testing might increase the diagnostic accuracy in patients with CKD, especially in patients with unknown etiology. The diagnostic utility of NGS has been shown mainly in pediatric CKD cohorts, while emerging data suggest that genetic testing can also be a valuable diagnostic tool in adults with CKD. In addition to its implications for unexplained CKD, NGS can contribute to the diagnostic process in kidney diseases with an atypical presentation, where it may lead to reclassification of the primary renal disease diagnosis. So far, only a few studies have reported on the diagnostic yield of NGS-based techniques in patients with unexplained CKD. Here, we will discuss the potential diagnostic role of gene panels and whole exome sequencing in pediatric and adult patients with unexplained and atypical CKD.

Indexed as

diagnostic utilityend-stage renal diseaseexome sequencinggenetic testingkidney disease

Identifiers

PMID31921302
PMCPMC6923268
OpenAlexW3002103916

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.