Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921293›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

CLARITE Facilitates the Quality Control and Analysis Process for EWAS of Metabolic-Related Traits.

Anastasia M Lucas, Nicole E Palmiero, John McGuigan, Kristin Passero, Jiayan Zhou, Deven Orie, Marylyn D Ritchie, Molly A Hall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Lupus nephritis or not? A simple and clinically friendly machine learning pipeline to help diagnosis of lupus nephritis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. What about the environment? Leveraging multi-omic datasets to characterize the environment's role in human health.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2021
    Article
  11. Software tools, databases and resources in metabolomics: updates from 2018 to 2019.Metabolomics : Official journal of the Metabolomic Society · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Anastasia M LucasDepartment of Genetics, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Nicole E PalmieroDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
John McGuiganDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Kristin PasseroDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Jiayan ZhouDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Deven OrieDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.
Marylyn D RitchieDepartment of Genetics, Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Molly A HallDepartment of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, United States.

Funding

Penn State Biomedical Big Data to Knowledge (B2D2K) Training ProgramT32LM012415 · NLM · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI BROACH, JAMES R., HONAVAR, VASANT G. · 2016 to 2020
$1.2M
NLM NIH HHS T32 LM012415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While genome-wide association studies are an established method of identifying genetic variants associated with disease, environment-wide association studies (EWAS) highlight the contribution of nongenetic components to complex phenotypes. However, the lack of high-throughput quality control (QC) pipelines for EWAS data lends itself to analysis plans where the data are cleaned after a first-pass analysis, which can lead to bias, or are cleaned manually, which is arduous and susceptible to user error. We offer a novel software, CLeaning to Analysis: Reproducibility-based Interface for Traits and Exposures (CLARITE), as a tool to efficiently clean environmental data, perform regression analysis, and visualize results on a single platform through user-guided automation. It exists as both an R package and a Python package. Though CLARITE focuses on EWAS, it is intended to also improve the QC process for phenotypes and clinical lab measures for a variety of downstream analyses, including phenome-wide association studies and gene-environment interaction studies. With the goal of demonstrating the utility of CLARITE, we performed a novel EWAS in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (N overall Discovery=9063, N overall Replication=9874) for body mass index (BMI) and over 300 environment variables post-QC, adjusting for sex, age, race, socioeconomic status, and survey year. The analysis used survey weights along with cluster and strata information in order to account for the complex survey design. Sixteen BMI results replicated at a Bonferroni corrected p < 0.05. The top replicating results were serum levels of g-tocopherol (vitamin E) (Discovery Bonferroni p: 8.67x10

Indexed as

body mass indexcomplex traitsexposomemetabolic diseasequality control

Identifiers

PMID31921293
PMCPMC6930237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.