Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921279›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2019

A Vision for Development and Utilization of High-Throughput Phenotyping and Big Data Analytics in Livestock.

James E Koltes, John B Cole, Roxanne Clemmens, Ryan N Dilger, Luke M Kramer, Joan K Lunney, Molly E McCue, Stephanie D McKay, Raluca G Mateescu, Brenda M Murdoch and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Artificial intelligence in animal breeding and genetics: applications, opportunities, and challenges.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Digital Phenotyping: A Game Changer for the Broiler Industry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The effects of breeding and selection on lactation in dairy cattle.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

James E KoltesDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
John B ColeAnimal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Roxanne ClemmensCollege of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Ryan N DilgerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States.
Luke M KramerDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Joan K LunneyAnimal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, United States.
Molly E McCueDepartment of Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, United States.
Stephanie D McKayDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Raluca G MateescuDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Brenda M MurdochDepartment of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.
Ryan ReuterDepartment of Animal and Food Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Caird E RexroadAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., DC, United States.
Guilherme J M RosaDepartment of Dairy Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Nick V L SerãoDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Stephen N WhiteAnimal Disease Research Unit, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Pullman, WA, United States.
M Jennifer Woodward-GreeneAgricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, Washington D.C., DC, United States.
Millie WorkuDepartment of Animal Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, United States.
Hongwei ZhangDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, College of Engineering, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
James M ReecyDepartment of Animal Science, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Iowa State University · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USAgricultural Research Service · USNorth Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University · USOklahoma State University · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Idaho · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USUniversity of Minnesota · USUniversity of Vermont · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USWashington State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Automated high-throughput phenotyping with sensors, imaging, and other on-farm technologies has resulted in a flood of data that are largely under-utilized. Drastic cost reductions in sequencing and other omics technology have also facilitated the ability for deep phenotyping of livestock at the molecular level. These advances have brought the animal sciences to a cross-roads in data science where increased training is needed to manage, record, and analyze data to generate knowledge and advances in Agriscience related disciplines. This paper describes the opportunities and challenges in using high-throughput phenotyping, "big data," analytics, and related technologies in the livestock industry based on discussions at the Livestock High-Throughput Phenotyping and Big Data Analytics meeting, held in November 2017 (see: https://www.animalgenome.org/bioinfo/community/workshops/2017/). Critical needs for investments in infrastructure for people (e.g., "big data" training), data (e.g., data transfer, management, and analytics), and technology (e.g., development of low cost sensors) were defined by this group. Though some subgroups of animal science have extensive experience in predictive modeling, cross-training in computer science, statistics, and related disciplines are needed to use big data for diverse applications in the field. Extensive opportunities exist for public and private entities to harness big data to develop valuable research knowledge and products to the benefit of society under the increased demands for food in a rapidly growing population.

Indexed as

automated phenotypingphenomicsprecision agricultureprecision livestock farmingsensors

Identifiers

PMID31921279
PMCPMC6934059
OpenAlexW2987479291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.