Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921014›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Quantitation and Comparison of Phenotypic Heterogeneity Among Single Cells of Monoclonal Microbial Populations.

Federica Calabrese, Iryna Voloshynovska, Florin Musat, Martin Thullner, Michael Schlömann, Hans H Richnow, Johannes Lambrecht, Susann Müller, Lukas Y Wick, Niculina Musat and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. NanoSIP: NanoSIMS Applications for Microbial Biology.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  8. Linguistic laws in biology.Trends in ecology & evolution · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federica CalabreseDepartment of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Iryna Voloshynovskale-tex Publishing Services GmbH, Leipzig, Germany.
Florin MusatDepartment of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin ThullnerDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Michael SchlömannInstitute of Biosciences, TU-Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany.
Hans H RichnowDepartment of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Johannes LambrechtDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Susann MüllerDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Lukas Y WickDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Niculina MusatDepartment of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Hryhoriy StryhanyukDepartment of Isotope Biogeochemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ, Leipzig, Germany.
Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research · DETU Bergakademie Freiberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic heterogeneity within microbial populations arises even when the cells are exposed to putatively constant and homogeneous conditions. The outcome of this phenomenon can affect the whole function of the population, resulting in, for example, new "adapted" metabolic strategies and impacting its fitness at given environmental conditions. Accounting for phenotypic heterogeneity becomes thus necessary, due to its relevance in medical and applied microbiology as well as in environmental processes. Still, a comprehensive evaluation of this phenomenon requires a common and unique method of quantitation, which allows for the comparison between different studies carried out with different approaches. Consequently, in this study, two widely applicable indices for quantitation of heterogeneity were developed. The heterogeneity coefficient (HC) is valid when the population follows unimodal activity, while the differentiation tendency index (DTI) accounts for heterogeneity implying outbreak of subpopulations and multimodal activity. We demonstrated the applicability of HC and DTI for heterogeneity quantitation on stable isotope probing with nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIP-nanoSIMS), flow cytometry, and optical microscopy datasets. The HC was found to provide a more accurate and precise measure of heterogeneity, being at the same time consistent with the coefficient of variation (CV) applied so far. The DTI is able to describe the differentiation in single-cell activity within monoclonal populations resolving subpopulations with low cell abundance, individual cells with similar phenotypic features (e.g., isotopic content close to natural abundance, as detected with nanoSIMS). The developed quantitation approach allows for a better understanding on the impact and the implications of phenotypic heterogeneity in environmental, medical and applied microbiology, microbial ecology, cell biology, and biotechnology.

Indexed as

anabolic activityflow cytometryheterogeneity quantitationmultimodalityphenotypic heterogeneitysingle-cell resolutionSIP–nanoSIMSZipf's law

Identifiers

PMID31921014
PMCPMC6933826
OpenAlexW2994856357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.