Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31921007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

The Compositionally Distinct Cyanobacterial Biocrusts From Brazilian Savanna and Their Environmental Drivers of Community Diversity.

Náthali Maria Machado-de-Lima, Vanessa Moreira Câmara Fernandes, Daniel Roush, Sergio Velasco Ayuso, Janaina Rigonato, Ferran Garcia-Pichel, Luis Henrique Zanini Branco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Distinct responses of Scytonema hyalinum and Leptolyngbya sp. to water availability and biocrust formation.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Round Trip to the Desert:Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. What Could Explain δMicrobial ecology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Náthali Maria Machado-de-LimaMicrobiology Graduation Program, Department of Zoology and Botany, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Vanessa Moreira Câmara FernandesCenter for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Daniel RoushCenter for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Sergio Velasco AyusoFacultad de Agronomía, Instituto de Investigaciones Fisiológicas y Ecológicas Vinculadas a la Agricultura (IFEVA-CONICET), Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Janaina RigonatoCenter for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, Brazil.
Ferran Garcia-PichelCenter for Fundamental and Applied Microbiomics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States.
Luis Henrique Zanini BrancoMicrobiology Graduation Program, Department of Zoology and Botany, São Paulo State University (UNESP), São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The last decade was marked by efforts to define and identify the main cyanobacterial players in biological crusts around the world. However, not much is known about biocrusts in Brazil's tropical savanna (

Indexed as

ariditybiocrustcerrado savannacyanobacteriaLeptolyngbyaPorphyrosiphon

Identifiers

PMID31921007
PMCPMC6929519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.