Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920951›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2019

A Single-Scan, Rapid Whole-Brain Protocol for Quantitative Water Content Mapping With Neurobiological Implications.

Ana-Maria Oros-Peusquens, Ricardo Loução, Zaheer Abbas, Vincent Gras, Markus Zimmermann, N J Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Field Strength-Dependent White Matter RMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Mapping a reproducible water fraction and TMagnetic resonance in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A MinireviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  15. The evaluation of the usefulness of COSurgical neurology international · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ana-Maria Oros-PeusquensInstitute of Neurosciences and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Ricardo LouçãoInstitute of Neurosciences and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Zaheer AbbasInstitute of Neurosciences and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Vincent GrasInstitute of Neurosciences and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Markus ZimmermannInstitute of Neurosciences and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
N J ShahInstitute of Neurosciences and Medicine 4 (INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Water concentration is tightly regulated in the healthy human brain and changes only slightly with age and gender in healthy subjects. Consequently, changes in water content are important for the characterization of disease. MRI can be used to measure changes in brain water content, but as these changes are usually in the low percentage range, highly accurate and precise methods are required for detection. The method proposed here is based on a long-TR (10 s) multiple-echo gradient-echo measurement with an acquisition time of 7:21 min. Using such a long TR ensures that there is no T

Indexed as

brain oedemabrain tumorsfast quantitative imagingquantitative macromolecular contentquantitative MRIquantitative water contentstrokeT2*

Identifiers

PMID31920951
PMCPMC6934004
OpenAlexW2993277982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.