Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920718›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2019

Interleukin-5 in the Pathophysiology of Severe Asthma.

Corrado Pelaia, Giovanni Paoletti, Francesca Puggioni, Francesca Racca, Girolamo Pelaia, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Enrico Heffler

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 192 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
192citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

192 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

132 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Corrado PelaiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giovanni PaolettiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Francesca PuggioniDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Francesca RaccaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Girolamo PelaiaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University "Magna Græcia" of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Giorgio Walter CanonicaDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Enrico HefflerDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interleukin-5 (IL-5) exerts a central pathogenic role in differentiation, recruitment, survival, and degranulation of eosinophils. Indeed, during the last years, significant advances have been made in our understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the powerful actions of IL-5 finalized to the induction, maintenance, and amplification of eosinophilic inflammation. Therefore, IL-5 is a suitable target for add-on biological therapies based on either IL-5 inhibition (mepolizumab, reslizumab) or blockade of its receptor (benralizumab). These modern treatments can result in being definitely beneficial for patients with severe type 2 (T2)-high eosinophilic asthma, refractory to conventional anti-inflammatory drugs such as inhaled and even systemic corticosteroids.

Indexed as

benralizumabeosinophilsIL-5mepolizumabreslizumabT2-high asthma

Identifiers

PMID31920718
PMCPMC6927944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.