Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2019

Using Low-Dimensional Manifolds to Map Relationships Between Dynamic Brain Networks.

Mohsen Bahrami, Robert G Lyday, Ramon Casanova, Jonathan H Burdette, Sean L Simpson, Paul J Laurienti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Statistical Brain Network Analysis.Annual review of statistics and its application · 2024
    Article
  3. Manifold Learning for fMRI time-varying FC.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Mixed Modeling Frameworks for Analyzing Whole-Brain Network Data.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohsen BahramiLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Robert G LydayLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Ramon CasanovaDepartment of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Jonathan H BurdetteLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Sean L SimpsonLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.
Paul J LaurientiLaboratory for Complex Brain Networks, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.

Funding

Wake Forest Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001420 · NCATS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARD, JAMY D, FOLEY, KRISTIE L · 2015 to 2023
$32.3M
Wake Forest Translational Alcohol Research Center (WF-TARC)P50AA026117 · NIAAA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Colleen A Hanlon · 2018 to 2026
$16.2M
The Effect of Pesticide Exposure on Cognitive and Brain Development in Latino Children: PACE5 Administrative Supplement 2R01ES008739 · NIEHS · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ARCURY, THOMAS A., LAURIENTI, PAUL · 2000 to 2022
$11.1M
Analytical Tools for Complex Brain Networks: Fusing Novel Statistical Methods and Network Science to Understand Brain FunctionR01EB024559 · NIBIB · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SIMPSON, SEAN L · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001420NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA026117NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB024559NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES008739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the field of dynamic brain networks continues to expand, new methods are needed to allow for optimal handling and understanding of this explosion in data. We propose here a novel approach that embeds dynamic brain networks onto a two-dimensional (2D) manifold based on similarities and differences in network organization. Each brain network is represented as a single point on the low dimensional manifold with networks of similar topology being located in close proximity. The rich spatio-temporal information has great potential for visualization, analysis, and interpretation of dynamic brain networks. The fact that each network is represented by a single point makes it possible to switch between the low-dimensional space and the full connectivity of any given brain network. Thus, networks in a specific region of the low-dimensional space can be examined to identify network features, such as the location of brain network hubs or the interconnectivity between brain circuits. In this proof-of-concept manuscript, we show that these low dimensional manifolds contain meaningful information, as they were able to successfully discriminate between cognitive tasks and study populations. This work provides evidence that embedding dynamic brain networks onto low dimensional manifolds has the potential to help us better visualize and understand dynamic brain networks with the hope of gaining a deeper understanding of normal and abnormal brain dynamics.

Indexed as

connectivity patterndynamic brain networksembeddingfMRIPCAt-SNE

Identifiers

PMID31920590
PMCPMC6914694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.