Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920578›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience2019

Male C57BL6/N and C57BL6/J Mice Respond Differently to Constant Light and Running-Wheel Access.

Kimberly M Capri, Marissa J Maroni, Hannah V Deane, Holly A Concepcion, Holly DeCourcey, Ryan W Logan, Joseph A Seggio

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Phenomenological Mouse Circadian Pacemaker Model.Journal of biological rhythms · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Changes in sleep EEG with aging in humans and rodents.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kimberly M CapriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States.
Marissa J MaroniDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States.
Hannah V DeaneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States.
Holly A ConcepcionDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States.
Holly DeCourceyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States.
Ryan W LoganTranslational Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
Joseph A SeggioDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, United States.
Bridgewater State University · USJackson Laboratory · US

Funding

Project 5: Circadian RhythmsP50DA039841 · NIDA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LAURA G REINHOLDT · 2016 to 2026
$26.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA039841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that exposure to circadian disruption produces negative effects on overall health and behavior. More recent studies illustrate that strain differences in the behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption exist, even if the strains have similar genetic backgrounds. As such, we investigated the effects of constant room-level light (LL) with running-wheel access on the behavior and physiology of male C57BL6/J from Jackson Laboratories and C57BL6/N from Charles River Laboratories mice. Mice were exposed to either a 12:12 light-dark (LD) cycle or LL and given either a standard home cage or a cage with a running-wheel. Following 6 weeks of LD or LL, their response to behavioral assays (open-field, light-dark box, novel object) and measures of metabolism were observed. Under standard LD, C57BL6/J mice exhibited increased locomotor activity and reduced exploratory behavior compared to C57BL6/N mice. In LL, C57BL6/J mice had greater period lengthening and increased anxiety, while C57BL6/N mice exhibited increased weight gain and no change in exploratory behavior. C57BL6/J mice also decreased exploration with running-wheel access while C57BL6/N mice did not. These results further demonstrate that C57BL/6 substrains exhibit different behavioral and physiological responses to circadian disruption and wheel-running access.

Indexed as

circadian rhythmconstant lightmicemouse modelrunning wheelstrain difference

Identifiers

PMID31920578
PMCPMC6914853
OpenAlexW2994794797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.