Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920570›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2019

Principles of Neurorehabilitation After Stroke Based on Motor Learning and Brain Plasticity Mechanisms.

Martina Maier, Belén Rubio Ballester, Paul F M J Verschure

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 242 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
242citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
21.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04910217 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Robot-Assisted Gait Therapy in the Subacute Phase of First Ischemic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital OstravaRan2022 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsConventional rehabilitation, Leg/lower body exerciser device intervention., Lokomat intervention
NCT05274360 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Neuroscience-Based Aphasia Therapy Adapted to Remote, Mobile-Based Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute for Bioengineering of CataloniaRan2021 to 2021Enrolled15ConditionsAphasia, Broca, Aphasia, Wernicke, Aphasia, Fluent, Aphasia, NonfluentArmsMobile evidence-based aphasia therapy, Conventional aphasia rehabilitation
NCT05904860 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Backward vs Forward Gait Training With Auditory Feedback in Patients With Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorShifa Tameer-e-Millat UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled44ConditionsStroke, IschemicArmsBackward Gait Training, Forward Gait Training
NCT07138495 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Integrating AI in Stroke Neurorehabilitation (AISN)

TypeinterventionalSponsorEodyne Systems SLRan2025 to 2026Enrolled192ConditionsStrokeArmsAI-personalized virtual reality rehabilitation system for unsupervised home-based stroke therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

242 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 460 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Effect of mobile application types on stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

182 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Martina MaierLaboratory of Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Belén Rubio BallesterLaboratory of Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Paul F M J VerschureLaboratory of Synthetic, Perceptive, Emotive and Cognitive Systems, Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia, The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia · ESInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

What are the principles underlying effective neurorehabilitation? The aim of neurorehabilitation is to exploit interventions based on human and animal studies about learning and adaptation, as well as to show that the activation of experience-dependent neuronal plasticity augments functional recovery after stroke. Instead of teaching compensatory strategies that do not reduce impairment but allow the patient to return home as soon as possible, functional recovery might be more sustainable as it ensures a long-term reduction in impairment and an improvement in quality of life. At the same time, neurorehabilitation permits the scientific community to collect valuable data, which allows inferring about the principles of brain organization. Hence neuroscience sheds light on the mechanisms of learning new functions or relearning lost ones. However, current rehabilitation methods lack the exact operationalization of evidence gained from skill learning literature, leading to an urgent need to bridge motor learning theory and present clinical work in order to identify a set of ingredients and practical applications that could guide future interventions. This work aims to unify the neuroscientific literature relevant to the recovery process and rehabilitation practice in order to provide a synthesis of the principles that constitute an effective neurorehabilitation approach. Previous attempts to achieve this goal either focused on a subset of principles or did not link clinical application to the principles of motor learning and recovery. We identified 15 principles of motor learning based on existing literature: massed practice, spaced practice, dosage, task-specific practice, goal-oriented practice, variable practice, increasing difficulty, multisensory stimulation, rhythmic cueing, explicit feedback/knowledge of results, implicit feedback/knowledge of performance, modulate effector selection, action observation/embodied practice, motor imagery, and social interaction. We comment on trials that successfully implemented these principles and report evidence from experiments with healthy individuals as well as clinical work.

Indexed as

motor learningneurorehabilitationplasticityprinciplesstroke

Identifiers

PMID31920570
PMCPMC6928101
OpenAlexW2990939922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.