ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019
An Improved
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Traction force transmission via bioactive matrix hydrogel promotes epithelial collective migration mediated by integrin.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating Leucine, Isoleucine, and Valine Ratios in Mixed Cortical Cell Cultures Following Cortical Trauma: An In Vitro Assessment.International journal of translational medicine (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Role of GPX3+ astrocytes in breast cancer brain metastasis activated by circulating tumor cell exosomes.NPJ precision oncology · 2025Article
- Ex vivo study of neuroinvasive and neurotropic viruses: what is current and what is next.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Article
- Modelling the central nervous system: tissue engineering of the cellular microenvironment.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Review
- Hydrogels for 3D Neural Tissue Models: Understanding Cell-Material Interactions at a Molecular Level.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracortical electrodes for brain-machine interfaces rely on intimate contact with tissues for recording signals and stimulating neurons. However, the long-term viability of intracortical electrodes
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.