Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920387›Full record

ReviewCancer management and research2019

Beyond Ruxolitinib: Fedratinib and Other Emergent Treatment Options for Myelofibrosis.

Jan Philipp Bewersdorf, Sara Mohamed Jaszczur, Salma Afifi, Jennifer C Zhao, Amer M Zeidan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer management and research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Repurpose but also (nano)-reformulate! The potential role of nanomedicine in the battle against SARS-CoV2.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Kinase inhibition in autoimmunity and inflammation.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jan Philipp BewersdorfDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3352-0902
Sara Mohamed JaszczurDepartment of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.
Salma AfifiDepartment of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1556-1025
Jennifer C ZhaoDepartment of Pharmacy, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7342-5785
Amer M ZeidanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Yale New Haven Hospital · USYale Cancer Center · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonal proliferation of differentiated myeloid cells leading to bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias and extramedullary hematopoiesis. In late 2019, the FDA approved the highly selective JAK2 inhibitor, fedratinib, for intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary MF, making it the second drug approved for MF after ruxolitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, which was approved for MF in 2011. The approval of fedratinib was based on phase II trials and the phase III JAKARTA trial, in which the drug significantly reduced splenomegaly and symptom burden compared to placebo, including some patients previously treated with ruxolitinib. The main side effects of fedratinib include anemia, gastrointestinal symptoms, and elevations in liver transaminases. Fedratinib also has ablack box warning for encephalopathy, although this occurred only in about 1% of the treated patients, most of which were ultimately felt not to represent Wernicke's encephalopathy. Nonetheless, monitoring of thiamine levels and supplementation are recommended especially in high-risk patients. This concern has led to a prolonged clinical hold and delayed the drug approval by several years during which the drug exchanged manufacturers, highlighting the need for meticulous investigation and adjudication of serious, but rare, adverse events in drug development that could end up preventing drugs with favorable risk/benefit ratio from being approved. In this review, we discuss the pharmacokinetic data and efficacy, as well as the toxicity results of clinical trials of fedratinib. We also review ongoing trials of JAK inhibitors in MF and explore future treatment options for MF patients who are refractory to ruxolitinib.

Indexed as

fedratinibJAK2MFmyelofibrosisruxolitinib

Identifiers

PMID31920387
PMCPMC6935287
OpenAlexW2995010510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.