Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31920216›Full record

ReviewCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire2020

Carbapenemase-producing

Rebecca E V Anderson, Patrick Boerlin

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Characterization of carbapenem-resistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Emergence of pandrug-resistant carbapenemase-producingFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Non-carbapenemase producing carbapenem-resistantThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2022
    Article
  11. Phenotypic and Genetic Characterization ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Molecular Epidemiology of Carbapenemases inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rebecca E V AndersonDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario NIG 2W1.
Patrick BoerlinDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario NIG 2W1.
University of Guelph · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carbapenemase-producing bacteria are difficult to treat and pose an important threat for public health. Detecting and identifying them can be a challenging and time-consuming task. Due to the recent rise in prevalence of infections with these organisms, there is an increased demand for rapid and accurate detection methods. This review describes and contrasts current methods used for the identification and detection of carbapenemase-producing bacteria to help control their spread in animal populations and along the food chain. The methods discussed include cultures used for screening clinical samples and primary isolation, susceptibility testing, culture-based and molecular confirmation tests. Advantages and disadvantages as well as limitations of the methods are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsEnterobacteriaceaeEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsHumansBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseCarbapenems

Identifiers

PMID31920216
PMCPMC6921994
OpenAlexW3013646564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.