Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919872›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of hematology2020

Pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for elderly patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: A study of the Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP-164 study).

Ho Sup Lee, Kihyun Kim, Seok Jin Kim, Je-Jung Lee, Inho Kim, Jin Seok Kim, Hyeon-Seok Eom, Dok Hyun Yoon, Cheolwon Suh, Ho-Jin Shin and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of hematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 14 institutions in 1 country.

Ho Sup LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-5974-6884
Kihyun KimDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seok Jin KimDepartment of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sunkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Je-Jung LeeDepartment of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, South Korea.
Inho KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Jin Seok KimDivision of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8986-8436
Hyeon-Seok EomDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Cancer Center of Korea, Goyang, South Korea.
Dok Hyun YoonDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Cheolwon SuhDepartment of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ho-Jin ShinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Yeung-Chul MunDepartment of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Min Kyoung KimDepartment of Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, South Korea.
Sung-Nam LimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Haeundae Baek Hospital, Busan, South Korea.
Chul Won ChoiDivision of Hematology-oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Hye Jin KangDepartment of Hemato-Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, South Korea.
Sung-Soo YoonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-2591-7459
Chang-Ki MinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.
Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMMWP)
Samsung Medical Center · KRSeoul National University Hospital · KRUlsan College · KRChonnam National University Hwasun Hospital · KREwha Womans University · KRInje University Haeundae Paik Hospital · KRKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRKorea University Medical Center · KRKosin University · KRNational Cancer Center · KRPusan National University Hospital · KRThe Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital · KRYeungnam University Medical Center · KRYonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with transplant-ineligible relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) have a short life expectancy, especially when they have failed both the proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator therapies. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (PCd) in elderly patients with RRMM. This phase 2 clinical trial recruited 55 elderly patients with RRMM. The patients underwent a 28-day treatment cycle: pomalidomide (4 mg/day on days 1-21, administered orally) and cyclophosphamide (400 mg/day on days 1, 8, and 15; administered orally) plus dexamethasone. The median (range) age of the patients was 73.3 (64-86) years, and 8 (14.5%) patients who were ≥ 80 years old. Eight (14.5%) and 31 (56.4%) patients exhibited stage III (revised international staging system) and frail status (simplified frailty scale), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) of PCd therapy were 58.2% and 72.7%, respectively. The median PFS and median overall survival (OS) were 6.90 months (95% CI, 4.7-9.0) and 18.48 months (95% CI, 9.4-27.6), respectively. The incidence rate of grade ≥ 3 non-hematological toxicities was 70.8%. In particular, the incidence rate of primary infection was 45.4%, including 21.8% for pneumonia, 9.0% for sepsis, and 14.6% for febrile neutropenia. In conclusion, PCd is an effective regimen for elderly patients with RRMM who had failed both bortezomib and lenalidomide treatments, but in whom the treatment-associated infection is the main cause of morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFebrile NeutropeniaFemaleFrail ElderlyFrailtyHematologic DiseasesHumansIncidenceInfectionsKaplan-Meier EstimateBortezomibCyclophosphamideDexamethasoneLenalidomideMelphalanMyeloma ProteinspomalidomidePrednisoneThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID31919872
PMCPMC7983889
OpenAlexW3000293006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.