Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919814›Full record

ArticleJournal of ultrasound2020

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the follow-up of pediatric abdominal injuries: value and timing.

Dacia Di Renzo, Antonello Persico, Gabriele Lisi, Maria Enrica Miscia, Giuseppe Lauriti, Giulia Sassano, Pierluigi Lelli Chiesa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ultrasound, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dacia Di RenzoPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy. dacia.direnzo@gmail.com.
Antonello PersicoPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
Gabriele LisiPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
Maria Enrica MisciaPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
Giuseppe LauritiPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
Giulia SassanoPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
Pierluigi Lelli ChiesaPediatric Surgery, "G. D'Annunzio" University of Chieti and "Spirito Santo" Hospital of Pescara, Via Fonte Romana n.8, 65124, Pescara, Italy.
University of Chieti-Pescara · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPrimary aim was to investigate the value and safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) during follow-up (FU) of splenic, hepatic and renal post-traumatic injuries in a pediatric population. Secondary aim was to extrapolate appropriate timing of FU-CEUS.

methodsIn a retrospective study, post-traumatic parenchymal injuries diagnosed with CT or CEUS, were subjected to non-operative management and followed with CEUS.

resultsForty-six patients were enrolled, with isolated or combined injuries, for a total of 30 splenic, 15 hepatic and 12 renal injuries. At admission 42/46 patients underwent CT and 4/46 underwent CEUS. During FU a total of 65 CEUS were performed: 16 within 72 h to check delayed active bleeding or parenchymal rupture; 24 between 5 and 10 days post admission, to pose indication to active mobilization or to discharge; 21 between 20 and 60 days post admission to document complete healing of the lesion or pose indication to discharge in most severe injuries. No complications related to CEUS were encountered.

conclusionsCEUS is valuable and safe to follow patients with post-traumatic abdominal injuries, even if further data are needed for renal injuries. We propose a tailored approach based on injury grade and clinical course: in the first 3 days only in case of delayed bleeding or rupture suspect; between 5 and 10 days post trauma to ensure a safe active mobilization and/or pose indication to discharge, and over 20-30 days post trauma to pose indication to discharge in most severe injuries or document complete healing and permit return to sport activities.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaAbdominal InjuriesAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage EnhancementKidneyLiverMaleRetrospective StudiesSpleenUltrasonographyWounds, NonpenetratingContrast MediaCEUSContrast-enhanced ultrasonographyFollow-upPediatricPediatric abdominal trauma

Identifiers

PMID31919814
PMCPMC7242601
OpenAlexW3000215944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.