Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919801›Full record

SynthesisDrugs & aging2020

Interventions to Reduce Adverse Drug Event-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Sarah Tecklenborg, Catherine Byrne, Caitriona Cahir, Lamorna Brown, Kathleen Bennett

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Drugs & aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah TecklenborgDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Catherine ByrneDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Caitriona CahirDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Lamorna BrownDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Kathleen BennettDivision of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, St Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. kathleenebennett@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-7665
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany studies focus on interventions that reduce the processes that lead to adverse drug events (ADEs), such as inappropriate or high-risk prescribing, without assessing whether they result in a reduction in ADEs or associated adverse health outcomes.

objectivesOur objective was to systematically review interventions to reduce the incidence of ADEs measured by health outcomes in older patients in primary care settings.

methodsThe review included randomised controlled trials, controlled clinical trials, controlled before and after studies, interrupted time series studies and cohort studies conducted in the community care setting. Older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) receiving medical treatment in primary care were included. Interventions were aimed at reducing adverse health outcomes associated with ADEs in older patients. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. Outcomes were measured by reductions in hospitalisation, emergency department (ED) visits, mortality and improvements in quality of life (QoL), mental health and physical function. Fixed and random-effects models were used to calculate pooled effect estimates comparing interventions and control groups for the outcomes, where feasible.

resultsThe literature search identified 1566 abstracts, seven of which were included in the systematic review. The interventions for reducing ADEs included prescription or medication reviews by a pharmacist (n = 4), primary care physician (n = 1) or research team (n = 1), and an educational intervention (n = 1) for nursing staff to improve the recognition of potentially harmful medications and corresponding ADEs. Meta-analysis found no statistically significant benefit from any interventions on hospitalisation, ED visits, mortality, QoL or mental health and physical function.

conclusionsNo significant benefit was gained from any of the interventions in terms of the outcomes considered. New approaches are required to reduce ADEs in older adults.

Indexed as

Professional RoleAgedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsEmergency Service, HospitalHospitalizationHumansInappropriate PrescribingPharmacistsPrimary Health CareQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID31919801
OpenAlexW3000224360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.