Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919682›Full record

SynthesisLasers in medical science2020

Transurethral endoscopic enucleation of the prostate using a diode laser versus bipolar plasmakinetic for benign prostatic obstruction: a meta-analysis.

Kai-Wen Xiao, Liang Zhou, Qing He, Guo Chen, Xiao-Shuai Gao, Yu Liu, Hong Li, Kun-Jie Wang

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Lasers in medical science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kai-Wen XiaoInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Liang ZhouInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Qing HeInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Guo ChenInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Shuai GaoInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Yu LiuInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Hong LiInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
Kun-Jie WangInstitute of Urology (Laboratory of Reconstructive Urology), Department of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, No. 37 Guo Xue Xiang, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. wangkj@scu.edu.cn.
Sichuan University · CN

Funding

1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University ZY2016104Project of Science and Technology Department of Chengdu, Research and application of urogenital suspension mesh 2016-HM02-00020-SFProject of Sichuan Provincial Health Department, Dual-source CT dual-energy urography and urolithiasis analysis in the early prevention and treatment of urolithiasis ZH2017-101Project of the Health and Family Planning Committee of Sichuan Province, The popularization and promotion of ureteroscopic technique in the treatment of upper urinary tract stones in primary hospitals 16PI294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) versus bipolar plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A systematic literature search was undertaken using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CKNI databases to identify eligible studies published before April 2019. The quality of evidence and methodology was assessed. Primary outcomes were clinical and demographic characteristics and postoperative efficacy including maximum flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual (PVR), quality of life (QoL), and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); secondary outcomes were intraoperative variables and major complications. Meta-analyses of extracted data were performed with the RevMan version 5.2. The overall effects were determined by the Z-test, and a p value less than 0.05 was considered with significant difference. A fixed- or random-effect model was chosen to fit the pooled heterogeneity (determined by Chi-squared test and I

Indexed as

Transurethral Resection of ProstateAgedClinical Trials as TopicHumansLasers, SemiconductorMalePostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodProstatic HyperplasiaPublication BiasQuality of LifeRiskTreatment OutcomeBHPDiode laserEnucleationMeta-analysisPlasmakinetic

Identifiers

PMID31919682
OpenAlexW2998927626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.