ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2020
Patient-reported outcome measures in the interaction between patient and clinician - a multi-perspective qualitative study.
Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multinational stakeholder engagement to inform future development and refinement of the EuroQol toddler and infant populations (EQ-TIPS).The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Patient and Physician Perspectives on Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Non-Dialysis-Dependent CKD Care: A Qualitative Study.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Rooting patient-reported outcomes in clinical care: a scoping review on benefits, challenges, and opportunities for patients and clinicians.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2025Article
- Patients' experiences of responding to a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for palliative care: a mixed method study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Beyond electronic health record data: leveraging natural language processing and machine learning to uncover cognitive insights from patient-nurse verbal communications.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025Article
- Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A Review of Reviews of Patient-Reported Measures in Psychosis: Need to Consider Factors Affecting Equity and the Involvement of Patients.Schizophrenia bulletin open · 2025Review
- The Nigerian Dietary Screening Tool: A Step toward Improved Patient-Clinician Communication in Nigerian Hospitals: A Pilot Implementation Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- Remote Symptom Monitoring Using Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Utilizing patient-nurse verbal communication in building risk identification models: the missing critical data stream in home healthcare.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Is the patient speaking or the nurse? Automatic speaker type identification in patient-nurse audio recordings.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023Article
- PRO-Act: a healthcare provider workshop outlining the added value of implementing PROs in routine HIV practice.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Remote Follow-up of Self-isolating Patients With COVID-19 Using a Patient Portal: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Pilot Study (Opal-COVID Study).JMIR research protocols · 2022Article
- Can patient-reported outcome measures be used to predict consultation needs in patients with psoriasis?: A survey study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Digital patient-reported outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease routine clinical practice: the clinician perspective.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2022Article
- Implementation of thyroid-related patient-reported outcomes in routine clinical practice.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Review
- Developing a Conceptual Disease Model of Patient Experiences and Identifying Patient-Reported Clinical Outcome Assessments for Use in Trials of Treatments for Focal Onset Seizures.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2022Article
- Cancer follow-up supported by patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing intended curative complex surgery for advanced cancer.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis article addresses patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up used as a substitute for regularly scheduled follow-ups. In PRO-based follow-up, patients' PRO data filled in by the patients at home are used by clinicians as a decision aid to identify those who need clinical attention based on an automated PRO algorithm, clinical attention being either a phone call or a physical consultation. A physical consultation in the outpatient clinic prompted by the patient's PRO is termed a "PRO consultation." In this multi-perspective qualitative study, we explored the influence of patients' self-reported data on patient-clinician interaction during PRO consultations in epilepsy outpatient clinics. Interpretive description was the methodological approach, applying data from participant observations, informal interviews with clinicians, and semi-structured interviews with clinicians and patients.
resultsWe found that application and deliberate use of patients' PRO measures can affect patient-clinician interaction, promoting patient involvement in terms of improved communication and increased patient activation. These findings reflect the general patterns that have been reported in the literature. In addition, we found that PRO measures also may induce unmet expectations among some patients that can have a negative effect on patients' experiences of the interaction and their follow-up experience in general. We extracted two thematic patterns that represent PRO measures' potential for patient involvement in the patient-clinician interaction. The first pattern represents enablers, and the second pattern represents barriers for PRO measures to affect patient involvement.
conclusionsApplying PRO measures in clinical practice does not automatically enhance the patient-clinician interaction. To strengthen the benefits of PRO measures, the following supplementary clinical initiatives are suggested: summarizing and reporting the PRO measures back to the patient, considering carefully which PRO measures to include, training clinicians and assuring that the patients' introduction to PRO-based follow-up clarifies expectations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.