ArticleDer Radiologe2020
[Dental X-ray diagnostics with the orthopantomography - Technique and typical imaging results].
Article in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of Osteoporosis with Tooth Loss and Dental Radiomorphometric Indices.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Influence of Examiner Experience on the Measurement of Bone-Loss by Low-Dose Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: An Ex Vivo Study.Journal of imaging · 2024Article
- Accumulated X-ray irradiation induces miR-187-5p upregulation mediating fibrotic buccal mucosal fibroblasts activities via DKK2.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Enigmatic Formations Found in Routine Orthopantomography (OPG) Examinations: A Case Report.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Imaging furcation defects with low-dose cone beam computed tomography.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Ex-vivo imaging of buccal and oral periodontal bone with low-dose CBCT in porcine jaws.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the increasing use of modern digital cross-sectional imaging techniques (especially digital volume tomography) in dental X‑ray examinations, orthopantomography remains the widely available, commonly used basic imaging modality for evaluating dental status prior to extensive treatment. It is also used for inflammatory and tumorous odontogenic osseous pathologies which are demonstrated with typical imaging findings. The classical X‑ray tomography principle has been further developed for the presentation of the differently wide, shape variants of dental arches. The examination unit, consisting of a rigidly connected X‑ray tube and detector, runs on an elliptical path around the facial skull. Thereby different rotation centers are controlled. Due to the different distances of the jaw sections to the X‑ray tube and the image receiver, differencing velocities result and thus blurring effects as the basis of the layer or slice representation. Slit collimators lead to a narrow and continuous line-like representation of the different widths of the dental arch.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.