ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2020
Clinical and associated inflammatory biomarker features predictive of short-term outcomes in non-systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toward Optimal Treatment Outcomes in New-Onset Polyarticular-Course Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Mind-body therapies and their interplay with the immune system in children and adolescents: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2025Article
- Transcriptional Profiling of Tofacitinib Treatment in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: Implications for Treatment Response Prediction.Arthritis care & research · 2025Article
- Patients with Adult-Onset Still's Disease in Germany: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Practices Ahead of the Release of the German Recommendations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Transition of clinical biomarker status from childhood into adolescence-A prospective study in children from eight European countries.PloS one · 2025Article
- Novel Immune biomarkers for the early stratification of oligoarthritis patients at risk of developing polyarticular extension.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Clinical and laboratory features of juvenile idiopathic arthritis with wrist involvement: Results of a retrospective cohort study.World journal of clinical pediatrics · 2024Article
- Article
- Association between high mobility group box 1 protein and juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a prospective longitudinal study.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2021Article
- Machine Learning in Rheumatic Diseases.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021Review
- Anti-TROVE2 Antibody Determined by Immune-Related Array May Serve as a Predictive Marker for Adalimumab Immunogenicity and Effectiveness in RA.Journal of immunology research · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
39 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo identify early predictors of disease activity at 18 months in JIA using clinical and biomarker profiling.
methodsClinical and biomarker data were collected at JIA diagnosis in a prospective longitudinal inception cohort of 82 children with non-systemic JIA, and their ability to predict an active joint count of 0, a physician global assessment of disease activity of ≤1 cm, and inactive disease by Wallace 2004 criteria 18 months later was assessed. Correlation-based feature selection and ReliefF were used to shortlist predictors and random forest models were trained to predict outcomes.
resultsFrom the original 112 features, 13 effectively predicted 18-month outcomes. They included age, number of active/effused joints, wrist, ankle and/or knee involvement, ESR, ANA positivity and plasma levels of five inflammatory biomarkers (IL-10, IL-17, IL-12p70, soluble low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 and vitamin D), at enrolment. The clinical plus biomarker panel predicted active joint count = 0, physician global assessment ≤ 1, and inactive disease after 18 months with 0.79, 0.80 and 0.83 accuracy and 0.84, 0.83, 0.88 area under the curve, respectively. Using clinical features alone resulted in 0.75, 0.72 and 0.80 accuracy, and area under the curve values of 0.81, 0.78 and 0.83, respectively.
conclusionA panel of five plasma biomarkers combined with clinical features at the time of diagnosis more accurately predicted short-term disease activity in JIA than clinical characteristics alone. If validated in external cohorts, such a panel may guide more rationally conceived, biologically based, personalized treatment strategies in early JIA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.