Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919386›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Non-essentiality of canonical cell division genes in the planctomycete Planctopirus limnophila.

Elena Rivas-Marin, Stijn H Peeters, Laura Claret Fernández, Christian Jogler, Laura van Niftrik, Sandra Wiegand, Damien P Devos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. iScience · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Marine drugs · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Elena Rivas-MarinCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD)-CSIC, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8696-8113
Stijn H PeetersDepartment of Microbiology, IWWR, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Laura Claret FernándezCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD)-CSIC, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain.
Christian JoglerDepartment of Microbiology, IWWR, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-3389
Laura van NiftrikDepartment of Microbiology, IWWR, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7011-7234
Sandra WiegandDepartment of Microbiology, IWWR, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-4896
Damien P DevosCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD)-CSIC, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain. damienpdevos@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9453-4753
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLCentro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most bacteria divide by binary fission using an FtsZ-based mechanism that relies on a multi-protein complex, the divisome. In the majority of non-spherical bacteria another multi-protein complex, the elongasome, is also required for the maintenance of cell shape. Components of these multi-protein assemblies are conserved and essential in most bacteria. Here, we provide evidence that at least three proteins of these two complexes are not essential in the FtsZ-less ovoid planctomycete bacterium Planctopirus limnophila which divides by budding. We attempted to construct P. limnophila knock-out mutants of the genes coding for the divisome proteins FtsI, FtsK, FtsW and the elongasome protein MreB. Surprisingly, ftsI, ftsW and mreB could be deleted without affecting the growth rate. On the other hand, the conserved ftsK appeared to be essential in this bacterium. In conclusion, the canonical bacterial cell division machinery is not essential in P. limnophila and this bacterium divides via budding using an unknown mechanism.

Indexed as

ActinsBacterial ProteinsMutationPenicillin-Binding ProteinsPhenotypePlanctomycetalesActinsBacterial ProteinsPenicillin-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31919386
PMCPMC6952346
OpenAlexW2999377005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.