Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919378›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Rapid and cost-effective generation of single specimen multilocus barcoding data from whole arthropod communities by multiple levels of multiplexing.

Guillemette A de Kerdrel, Jeremy C Andersen, Susan R Kennedy, Rosemary Gillespie, Henrik Krehenwinkel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Three steps towards comparability and standardization among molecular methods for characterizing insect communities.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DNA barcodes of birds from northern Colombia.Biodiversity data journal · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Guillemette A de KerdrelDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Mulford Hall, Berkeley, California, USA.
Jeremy C AndersenDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Mulford Hall, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9273-6490
Susan R KennedyDepartment of Biogeography, Trier University, Trier, Germany.
Rosemary GillespieDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Mulford Hall, Berkeley, California, USA.
Henrik KrehenwinkelDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Policy and Management, University of California Berkeley, Mulford Hall, Berkeley, California, USA. Krehenwinkel@uni-trier.de.
University of California, Berkeley · USOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JPTrier University of Applied Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In light of the current biodiversity crisis, molecular barcoding has developed into an irreplaceable tool. Barcoding has been considerably simplified by developments in high throughput sequencing technology, but still can be prohibitively expensive and laborious when community samples of thousands of specimens need to be processed. Here, we outline an Illumina amplicon sequencing approach to generate multilocus data from large collections of arthropods. We reduce cost and effort up to 50-fold, by combining multiplex PCRs and DNA extractions from pools of presorted and morphotyped specimens and using two levels of sample indexing. We test our protocol by generating a comprehensive, community wide dataset of barcode sequences for several thousand Hawaiian arthropods from 14 orders, which were collected across the archipelago using various trapping methods. We explore patterns of diversity across the Archipelago and compare the utility of different arthropod trapping methods for biodiversity explorations on Hawaii, highlighting undergrowth beating as highly efficient method. Moreover, we show the effects of barcode marker, taxonomy and relative biomass of the targeted specimens and sequencing coverage on taxon recovery. Our protocol enables rapid and inexpensive explorations of diversity patterns and the generation of multilocus barcode reference libraries across whole ecosystems.

Indexed as

BiodiversityCost-Benefit AnalysisEcosystemAnimalsArthropodsDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHawaiiMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID31919378
PMCPMC6952404
OpenAlexW2998955672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.