Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919367›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

New data from Monoplacophora and a carefully-curated dataset resolve molluscan relationships.

Kevin M Kocot, Albert J Poustka, Isabella Stöger, Kenneth M Halanych, Michael Schrödl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Molluscan Shells, Spicules, and Gladii Are Evolutionarily Deeply Conserved.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Neuronal segmentation in cephalopod arms.Nature communications · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Neuronal segmentation in cephalopod arms.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Scaphopoda is the sister taxon to Bivalvia: Evidence of ancient incomplete lineage sorting.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kevin M KocotDepartment of Biological Sciences and Alabama Museum of Natural History, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, 35487, USA. kmkocot@ua.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8673-2688
Albert J PoustkaEvolution and Development Group, Max-Planck Institute for Molecular Genetics, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
Isabella StögerSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Munich, 81247, Germany.
Kenneth M HalanychDepartment of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, 36849, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8658-9674
Michael SchrödlSNSB-Bavarian State Collection of Zoology, Munich, 81247, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Relationships among the major lineages of Mollusca have long been debated. Morphological studies have considered the rarely collected Monoplacophora (Tryblidia) to have several plesiomorphic molluscan traits. The phylogenetic position of this group is contentious as morphologists have generally placed this clade as the sister taxon of the rest of Conchifera whereas earlier molecular studies supported a clade of Monoplacophora + Polyplacophora (Serialia) and phylogenomic studies have generally recovered a clade of Monoplacophora + Cephalopoda. Phylogenomic studies have also strongly supported a clade including Gastropoda, Bivalvia, and Scaphopoda, but relationships among these taxa have been inconsistent. In order to resolve conchiferan relationships and improve understanding of early molluscan evolution, we carefully curated a high-quality data matrix and conducted phylogenomic analyses with broad taxon sampling including newly sequenced genomic data from the monoplacophoran Laevipilina antarctica. Whereas a partitioned maximum likelihood (ML) analysis using site-homogeneous models recovered Monoplacophora sister to Cephalopoda with moderate support, both ML and Bayesian inference (BI) analyses using mixture models recovered Monoplacophora sister to all other conchiferans with strong support. A supertree approach also recovered Monoplacophora as the sister taxon of a clade composed of the rest of Conchifera. Gastropoda was recovered as the sister taxon of Scaphopoda in most analyses, which was strongly supported when mixture models were used. A molecular clock based on our BI topology dates diversification of Mollusca to ~546 MYA (+/- 6 MYA) and Conchifera to ~540 MYA (+/- 9 MYA), generally consistent with previous work employing nuclear housekeeping genes. These results provide important resolution of conchiferan mollusc phylogeny and offer new insights into ancestral character states of major mollusc clades.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremGenomePhylogenyAnimalsCell NucleusDatasets as TopicGenomicsMolluscaSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31919367
PMCPMC6952402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.