ArticleRevista espanola de salud publica2020
[Conceptuation on fibromyalgia: consensus or discrepancy among healthcare providers from Spain?]
Article in Revista espanola de salud publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe clinical approach of fibromyalgia is a cause of frustration for some professionals due to the controversy on its diagnosis, etiopathology and clinical management. The aim of this study was to explore the beliefs and knowledge on fibromyalgia among health professionals from different specialties of the public health service from Almería province.
methodsA descriptive and cross-sectional study was carried out. A questionnaire prepared ex profeso was applied to a sample of 103 clinicians from Primary Care Physicians, Mental Health, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology. The chi-square test was performed to explore the relationships among variables.
results59.7% of Primary Care providers and 66.7% of Internal Medicine conceptualized fibromyalgia as a somatization. Likewise, 58.9% of Primary Care indicated that fibromyalgia should be considered in no case as a disabling illness, compared to 16.7% from Rheumatology, as well as for 42.5% of them the fibromyalgia diagnosis is not essential, compared to the amount of other specialties. Mood disorders were mentioned by 53.4% of Primary Care as entities from which fibromyalgia is difficult to discriminate. Sleep or gastrointestinal problems were mentioned by 83.3% and 50% of Rheumatology professionals, respectively.
conclusionsA high percentage of professionals considered fibromyalgia as a psychogenic entity, especially among Internal Medicine and Primary Care, highlighting in the last one a position against the consideration of disability and its difficult differentiation from mood disorders. These latest findings could be explained by beliefs or attitudes on the amplification of pain behaviors and secondary gains. A deeper knowledge on fibromyalgia symptoms from Rheumatology is highlighted. Methodological limitations and recommendations are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31919340PMC11566368W3001549703What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.