Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31919122›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Sexual health needs of female sex workers in Côte d'Ivoire: a mixed-methods study to prepare the future implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention.

Valentine Becquet, Marcellin Nouaman, Mélanie Plazy, Jean-Marie Masumbuko, Camille Anoma, Soh Kouame, Christine Danel, Serge Paul Eholie, Joseph Larmarange, ANRS 12361 PrEP-CI Study group

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Awareness, Willingness, and Perceived Efficacy of Pre-exposure Prophylaxis among Adolescent Sexual Minority Males.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentine BecquetINED (French Institute for Demographic Studies), Paris, France valentine.becquet@ined.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-3599-5445
Marcellin NouamanProgramme PAC-CI/ANRS Research Site, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Mélanie PlazyISPED, Inserm Research Center 1219 (Bordeaux Population Health), Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Marie MasumbukoProgramme PAC-CI/ANRS Research Site, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Camille AnomaEspace Confiance, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Soh KouameAprosam, San Pedro, Côte d'Ivoire.
Christine DanelProgramme PAC-CI/ANRS Research Site, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Serge Paul EholieProgramme PAC-CI/ANRS Research Site, Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire.
Joseph LarmarangeCEPED, Centre for Population and Development, (Paris Descartes University, IRD, Inserm), Paris, France.
ANRS 12361 PrEP-CI Study group
Programme PAC-CI · CIUniversité de Bordeaux · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FRInstitut national d'études démographiques · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of female sex workers (FSWs) to inform the future implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention in this population. DESIGN AND

settingThe ANRS 12361 PrEP-CI cross-sectional and mixed-methods study was designed and implemented with two community-based organisations in Côte d'Ivoire.

participantsA convenience sample of 1000 FSWs aged ≥18, not known as HIV-positive, completed a standardised questionnaire assessing sociodemographic characteristics, sexual practices, use of community health services and a priori acceptability of PrEP. Twenty-two indepth interviews and eight focus group discussions were also conducted to document FSWs' risky practices and sexual behaviours, experiences with violence and discrimination, attitudes regarding HIV and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), and barriers to SRH services.

resultsAlthough 87% described consistent condom use with clients, more than 22% declared accepting condomless sexual intercourse for a large sum of money. Furthermore, condom use with their steady partner and knowledge of their partner's HIV status were low despite their acknowledged concurrent sexual partnerships. While inconsistent condom use exposed FSWs to STIs and undesired pregnancies, the prevalence of contraceptive strategies other than condoms was low (39%) due to fear of contraception causing sterility. FSWs faced obstacles to accessing SRH care and preferred advice from their peers or self-medication.

conclusionsDespite adoption of preventive behaviour in most cases, FSWs are still highly exposed to HIV. Furthermore, FSWs seem to face several barriers to accessing SRH. Implementing PrEP among FSWs in West Africa, such as in Côte d'Ivoire, constitutes an opportunity to consider the regular follow-up of HIV-negative FSWs. PrEP initiation should not condition access to SRH services; conversely, SRH services could be a way to attract FSWs into HIV prevention. Our results highlight the importance of developing a people-focused approach that integrates all SRH needs when transitioning from PrEP efficacy trials to implementation.

Indexed as

HIVAdultCote d'IvoireCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHIV InfectionsHumansMalePre-Exposure ProphylaxisRetrospective StudiesSafe SexSexual BehaviorSexually Transmitted DiseasesSexual PartnersSex WorkersdemographyepidemiologyHIV & AIDSpublic healthqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID31919122
PMCPMC6955511
OpenAlexW2999847943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.