Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31918918›Full record

ArticleMolecular metabolism2020

NPY

Stefanie Wittrisch, Nora Klöting, Karin Mörl, Rima Chakaroun, Matthias Blüher, Annette G Beck-Sickinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular metabolism, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. The evolving landscape of obesity pharmacotherapy.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intranasal Application of Peptides Modulating the Neuropeptide Y System.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Research advances in peptide‒drug conjugates.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefanie WittrischUniversität Leipzig, Institute of Biochemistry, Brüderstraße 34, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Nora KlötingHelmholtz Institute for Metabolic, Obesity, and Vascular Research (HI-MAG) of the Helmholtz Zentrum München at the University of Leipzig and University Hospital Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: nora.kloeting@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Karin MörlUniversität Leipzig, Institute of Biochemistry, Brüderstraße 34, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Rima ChakarounHelmholtz Institute for Metabolic, Obesity, and Vascular Research (HI-MAG) of the Helmholtz Zentrum München at the University of Leipzig and University Hospital Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias BlüherHelmholtz Institute for Metabolic, Obesity, and Vascular Research (HI-MAG) of the Helmholtz Zentrum München at the University of Leipzig and University Hospital Leipzig, Ph.-Rosenthal-Str. 27, 04103 Leipzig, Germany; Department of Medicine, University of Leipzig, Liebigstraße 20, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: matthias.blueher@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Annette G Beck-SickingerUniversität Leipzig, Institute of Biochemistry, Brüderstraße 34, 04103 Leipzig, Germany. Electronic address: abeck-sickinger@uni-leipzig.de.
Leipzig University · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePPARα/γ dual agonists have been in clinical development for the treatment of metabolic diseases including type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. However, severe adverse side effects led to complications in clinical trials. As most of the beneficial effects rely on the compound activity in adipocytes, the selective targeting of this cell type is a cutting-edge strategy to develop safe anti-diabetic drugs. The goal of this study was to strengthen the adipocyte-specific uptake of the PPARα/γ agonist tesaglitazar via NPY

methodsNPY

resultsIn vitro studies revealed that the tesaglitazar-[F

conclusionsThe use of the tesaglitazar-[F7, P34]-NPY conjugate is a promising strategy to apply the beneficial PPARα/γ effects in adipocytes while potentially omitting adverse effects in other tissues.

Indexed as

3T3-L1 CellsAdipocytesAdipogenesisAlkanesulfonatesAnimalsCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsDiabetes Mellitus, ExperimentalDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Dose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHEK293 CellsHumansMiceAlkanesulfonatesneuropeptide Y-Y1 receptorPeptidesPhenylpropionatesPPAR alphaPPAR gammaReceptors, Neuropeptide YtesaglitazarAdipocyte targetingNPY(1)RPeptide drug conjugateTesaglitazarType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31918918
PMCPMC6931124
OpenAlexW2985050253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.