Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31918754›Full record

ReviewNeural development2020

Evaluating the effectiveness of anti-Nogo treatment in spinal cord injuries.

Raihan Mohammed, Kaesi Opara, Rahul Lall, Utkarsh Ojha, Jinpo Xiang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Pathophysiology and Therapeutic Approaches for Spinal Cord Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raihan MohammedDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK. rm758@cam.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0824-5243
Kaesi OparaDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
Rahul LallDepartment of Medicine, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Hills Rd, Cambridge, CB2 0SP, UK.
Utkarsh OjhaFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Jinpo XiangFaculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBImperial College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As humans, we cannot regenerate axons within the central nervous system (CNS), therefore, making any damage to it permanent. This leads to the loss of sensory and motor function below the site of injury and can be crippling to a person's health. Spontaneous recovery can occur from plastic changes, but it is minimal. The absence of regeneration is due to the inhibitory environment of the CNS as well as the inherent inability of CNS axons to form growth cones. Amongst many factors, one of the major inhibitory signals of the CNS environment is the myelin-associated Nogo pathway. Nogo-A, Nogo-B and Nogo-C (Nogo), stimulate the Nogo receptor, inhibiting neurite outgrowth by causing growth cones to collapse through activation of Rho Kinase (ROCK). Antibodies can be used to target this signalling pathway by binding to Nogo and thus promote the outgrowth of neuronal axons in the CNS. This use of anti-Nogo antibodies has been shown to upregulate CNS regeneration as well as drastically improve sensory and motor function in both rats and primates when coupled with adequate training. Here, we evaluate whether the experimental success of anti-Nogo at improving CNS regeneration can be carried over into the clinical setting to treat spinal cord injuries (SCI) and their symptoms successfully. Furthermore, we also discuss potential methods to improve the current treatment and any developmental obstacles.

Indexed as

Nerve RegenerationAnimalsAntibodiesGrowth ConesHumansImmunotherapyNeuronsNogo ProteinsSignal TransductionSpinal Cord InjuriesTreatment OutcomeAntibodiesNogo ProteinsAxonCNSMyelinNogoRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID31918754
PMCPMC6953157
OpenAlexW3005666771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.