Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31918740›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2020

Preventing opioid overdose with peer-administered naloxone: findings from a rural state.

Bridget L Hanson, Rebecca R Porter, Amanda L Zöld, Heather Terhorst-Miller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Correlates of Rural Naloxone Possession Among People Who Use Drugs: A Multi-State Cross-Sectional Analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Wearable Device Towards Automatic Detection and Treatment of Opioid Overdose.IEEE transactions on biomedical circuits and systems · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Social History of Opioids' Crimedical Cycle.Addiction research & theory · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bridget L HansonUniversity of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA. BLHanson4@alaska.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8441-8601
Rebecca R PorterUniversity of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.
Amanda L ZöldUniversity of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.
Heather Terhorst-MillerUniversity of Wisconsin-Stout, 712 South Broadway St, Menomonie, WI, 54751, USA.
University of Alaska Anchorage · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Stout · US

Funding

SAMHSA HHS 1H79SP022117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn response to the opioid epidemic, naloxone distribution programs aim to prevent overdose death by making naloxone available and training people to use it. Peers of individuals at risk of opioid overdose are well-positioned to administer naloxone and prevent overdose death.

methodsWe conducted key informant interviews with 18 individuals with past or current opioid and heroin drug use who had administered naloxone to a peer during an overdose emergency. Interviews explored individuals' experiences with administration and their recommendations for program and policy improvement. Data were systematically coded and analyzed for themes.

resultsParticipants sought naloxone rescue kits because they perceived high risk of overdose. They described high satisfaction with training and felt prepared to administer naloxone during overdose incidents. Overwhelmingly, participants perceived naloxone to be effective and emphasized the need to make it widely available. Findings suggest that engagement in overdose prevention strategies other than naloxone differs by gender, with females more likely than males to use multiple different strategies. Participants described that overdose experiences do not have a lasting impact on drug use behaviors.

conclusionsFindings support the feasibility of naloxone distribution to peer opioid and heroin users and provide recommendations for policy improvement, including effective and well-advertised Good Samaritan laws and links to treatment for opioid use disorder.

Indexed as

Peer GroupAdultAlaskaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdoseRural PopulationYoung AdultNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsNaloxoneOpioid epidemicOpioid overdose

Identifiers

PMID31918740
PMCPMC6953279
OpenAlexW2999747725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.