Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31918724›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020

The impact of differing frames on early stages of intersectoral collaboration: the case of the First 1000 Days Initiative in the Western Cape Province.

Ida Okeyo, Uta Lehmann, Helen Schneider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ida OkeyoSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, 7535, Republic of South Africa. idaokeyo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1131-9378
Uta LehmannSchool of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, 7535, Republic of South Africa.
Helen SchneiderSchool of Public Health and UWC/SAMRC Health Services to Systems Research Unit, University of the Western Cape, Robert Sobukwe Road, Bellville, 7535, Republic of South Africa.

Funding

South African Research Chairs Initiative of the Department of Science and Technology and National Research Foundation of South Africa 98918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile intersectoral collaboration is considered valuable and important for achieving health outcomes, there are few examples of successes. The literature on intersectoral collaboration suggests that success relies on a shared understanding of what can be achieved collectively and whether stakeholders can agree on mutual goals or acceptable trade-offs. When health systems are faced with negotiating intersectoral responses to complex issues, achieving consensus across sectors can be a challenging and uncertain process. Stakeholders may present divergent framings of the problem based on their disciplinary background, interests and institutional mandates. This raises an important question about how different frames of problems and solutions affect the potential to work across sectors during the initiating phases of the policy process.

methodsIn this paper, this question was addressed through an analysis of the case of the First 1000 Days (FTD) Initiative, an intersectoral approach targeting early childhood in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. We conducted a documentary analysis of 34 policy and other documents on FTD (spanning global, national and subnational spheres) using Schmidt's conceptualisation of policy ideas in order to elicit framings of the policy problem and solutions.

resultsWe identified three main frames, associated with different sectoral positionings - a biomedical frame, a nurturing care frame and a socioeconomic frame. Anchored in these different frames, ideas of the problem (definition) and appropriate policy solutions engaged with FTD and the task of intersectoral collaboration at different levels, with a variety of (sometimes cross) purposes.

conclusionsThe paper concludes on the importance of principled engagement processes at the beginning of collaborative processes to ensure that different framings are revealed, reflected upon and negotiated in order to arrive at a joint determination of common goals.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentHealth PolicyIntersectoral CollaborationChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesQualitative ResearchSocial WorkSocioeconomic FactorsSouth AfricaCommon goalsFirst 1000 DaysFramesIntersectoral collaborationPolicy formulationPolicy ideasSouth AfricaWestern Cape Province

Identifiers

PMID31918724
PMCPMC6953299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.