Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31918689›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2020

Can participatory video reduce mental illness stigma? Results from a Canadian action-research study of feasibility and impact.

Rob Whitley, Kathleen C Sitter, Gavin Adamson, Victoria Carmichael

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Participatory Research with Persons who Experience Mental Illness in Occupational Therapy: A Scoping Review.Canadian journal of occupational therapy. Revue canadienne d'ergotherapie · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Out of Darkness Project: Innovative Multimedia Digital Storytelling in Psychiatry.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rob WhitleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada. robert.whitley@mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-5376-9241
Kathleen C SitterUniversity of Calgary, 2500 University Dr. NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Gavin AdamsonSchool of Journalism, Ryerson University, 350 Victoria St, Toronto, ON, M5B 2K3, Canada.
Victoria CarmichaelDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Hospital Research Centre, McGill University, 6875 LaSalle Blvd, Montreal, QC, H4H 1R3, Canada.

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA) 136796
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence suggests that stigma against people with mental illness remains high. This demands innovative approaches to reduce stigma. One innovative stigma reduction method is participatory video (PV), whereby marginalized people come together to script, film and produce bottom-up educational videos about shared issues. These videos are then shown to target groups. This paper has two objectives (i) to examine the feasibility of using participatory video with people with severe mental illness (SMI); and (ii) to assess viewer impressions of the resultant videos and subsequent subjective impact.

methodsWe conducted a participatory action research study with three workgroups of people with severe mental illness situated in different Canadian cities, who set out to create and disseminate locally-grounded mental-health themed videos. This involved process and outcome evaluation to assess feasibility and impact. Specifically, we (i) observed fidelity to a co-designed action-plan in all three workgroups; (ii) distributed brief purpose-built questionnaires to viewers at organized screenings to assess preliminary impact; and (iii) conducted focus groups with viewers to elicit further impressions of the videos and subsequent subjective impact.

resultsThe three workgroups achieved high-fidelity to the action-plan. They successfully produced a total of 26 videos, over double the targeted number, during an 18-month period. Likewise, the workgroups organized 49 screenings at a range of venues attended by 1542 people, again exceeding the action-plan targets. Results from the viewer questionnaires (N = 1104, response rate 72%) indicated that viewers reported that their understandings had improved after watching the videos. Four themes emerged from six viewer focus groups (N = 30), with participants frequently noting that videos were (i) educational and informative; (ii) real and relatable; (iii) attention-grabbing; and (iv) change-inducing.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this study is the first large-scale multi-site project examining the feasibility and impact of a participatory video program for people with severe mental illness. The results indicate that participatory video is a feasible method in this population and gives preliminary evidence that resultant videos can reduce viewer stigma. Thus, participatory video should be considered a promising practice in the ongoing effort to reduce mental illness stigma.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersSocial StigmaCanadaFeasibility StudiesHealth Services ResearchHumansCanadaDigital storytellingFeasibilityMental illnessMixed-methodsParticipatory action researchParticipatory videoPsychiatryRecoveryStigma

Identifiers

PMID31918689
PMCPMC6953159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.