Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31918681›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2020

Men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss: a systematic review and emerging theoretical model.

Kate Louise Obst, Clemence Due, Melissa Oxlad, Philippa Middleton

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after perinatal loss in fathers: A systematic review.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Grieving from the Margins: Black Canadian Men Navigating the Invisible Burden of Perinatal Loss and Masculine Expectations.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Perceived Social Support, Shame, and Psychopathological Symptoms After Perinatal Loss in Portuguese Women.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Trends in Miscarriages and Stillbirths in Panama From 2002 to 2024.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2026
    Article
  20. The Supporter Needs Supporting Too: A Qualitative Study to Understand the Maternity Care Experience for Partners Following a Previous Perinatal Death.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kate Louise ObstSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. kate.obst@adelaide.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6976-9035
Clemence DueSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Melissa OxladSchool of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Philippa MiddletonSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
The University of Adelaide · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship N/AWestpac Bicentennial Foundation 2018 Westpac Future Leaders Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEmotional distress following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss is common, with enduring grief occurring for many parents. However, little is known about men's grief, since the majority of existing literature and subsequent bereavement care guidelines have focused on women. To develop a comprehensive understanding of men's grief, this systematic review sought to summarise and appraise the literature focusing on men's grief following pregnancy loss and neonatal loss.

methodsA systematic review was undertaken with searches completed across four databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and CINAHL). These were guided by two research questions: 1) what are men's experiences of grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss; and 2) what are the predictors of men's grief following pregnancy/neonatal loss? Eligible articles were qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods empirical studies including primary data on men's grief, published between 1998 and October 2018. Eligibility for loss type included miscarriage or stillbirth (by any definition), termination of pregnancy for nonviable foetal anomaly, and neonatal death up to 28 days after a live birth.

resultsA final sample of 46 articles were identified, including 26 qualitative, 19 quantitative, and one mixed methods paper. Findings indicate that men's grief experiences are highly varied, and current grief measures may not capture all of the complexities of grief for men. Qualitative studies identified that in comparison to women, men may face different challenges including expectations to support female partners, and a lack of social recognition for their grief and subsequent needs. Men may face double-disenfranchised grief in relation to the pregnancy/neonatal loss experience.

conclusionThere is a need to increase the accessibility of support services for men following pregnancy/neonatal loss, and to provide recognition and validation of their experiences of grief. Cohort studies are required among varied groups of bereaved men to confirm grief-predictor relationships, and to refine an emerging socio-ecological model of men's grief. TRIALS REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018103981.

Indexed as

GriefModels, TheoreticalAbortion, SpontaneousAdultFathersFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMalePerinatal DeathPregnancyFathersGriefMenMiscarriageNeonatal lossStillbirthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID31918681
PMCPMC6953275
OpenAlexW2999117352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.