ArticleBiofabrication2020
Combining multi-scale 3D printing technologies to engineer reinforced hydrogel-ceramic interfaces.
Article in Biofabrication, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
56 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pondering the Potential of Hyaline Cartilage-Derived Chondroprogenitors for Tissue Regeneration: A Systematic Review.Cartilage · 2021Pooled it
- Innovative Hydroxyapatite-Hydrogel Composites for Cartilage Regeneration.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Diels-Alder Click Chemistry as a Dynamic-Covalent Crosslinking Method in Spheroid-Encapsulating Hydrogels for Cartilage Engineering.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Hybrid SES-MEW Scaffold Strategies: A Narrative Review of Multi-Scale Fiber Architectures for Soft and Hard Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Interface Performance Enhancement in 3D-Printed Biphasic Scaffolds with Interlocking Hourglass Geometry.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- 3D bioprinted scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration: advancements and applications.Materials today. Bio · 2025Review
- Advancements in Musculoskeletal Tissue Engineering: The Role of Melt Electrowriting in 3D-Printed Scaffold Fabrication.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- Guidance on biomaterials for periodontal tissue regeneration: Fabrication methods, materials and biological considerations.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Biofabrication - Revolutionizing the future of regenerative periodontics.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Hierarchy Reproduction: Multiphasic Strategies for Tendon/Ligament-Bone Junction Repair.Biomaterials research · 2025Review
- Advancements and Challenges in Hydrogel Engineering for Regenerative Medicine.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Orthotopic equine study confirms the pivotal importance of structural reinforcement over the pre-culture of cartilage implants.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024Article
- Bioprinting of gelatin-based materials for orthopedic application.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- 3D printed osteochondral scaffolds: design strategies, present applications and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Nanomaterials-incorporated hydrogels for 3D bioprinting technology.Nano convergence · 2023Review
- Role of pH and Crosslinking Ions on Cell Viability and Metabolic Activity in Alginate-Gelatin 3D Prints.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Achieving Nasal Septal Cartilage In Situ Regeneration: Focus on Cartilage Progenitor Cells.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Fabricating the cartilage: recent achievements.Cytotechnology · 2023Review
- Recent development in multizonal scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multi-material 3D printing technologies that resolve features at different lengths down to the microscale open new avenues for regenerative medicine, particularly in the engineering of tissue interfaces. Herein, extrusion printing of a bone-biomimetic ceramic ink and melt electrowriting (MEW) of spatially organized polymeric microfibres are integrated for the biofabrication of an osteochondral plug, with a mechanically reinforced bone-to-cartilage interface. A printable physiological temperature-setting bioceramic, based on α-tricalcium phosphate, nanohydroxyapatite and a custom-synthesized biodegradable and crosslinkable poloxamer, was developed as bone support. The mild setting reaction of the bone ink enabled us to print directly within melt electrowritten polycaprolactone meshes, preserving their micro-architecture. Ceramic-integrated MEW meshes protruded into the cartilage region of the composite plug, and were embedded with mechanically soft gelatin-based hydrogels, laden with articular cartilage chondroprogenitor cells. Such interlocking design enhanced the hydrogel-to-ceramic adhesion strength >6.5-fold, compared with non-interlocking fibre architectures, enabling structural stability during handling and surgical implantation in osteochondral defects ex vivo. Furthermore, the MEW meshes endowed the chondral compartment with compressive properties approaching those of native cartilage (20-fold reinforcement versus pristine hydrogel). The osteal and chondral compartment supported osteogenesis and cartilage matrix deposition in vitro, and the neo-synthesized cartilage matrix further contributed to the mechanical reinforcement at the ceramic-hydrogel interface. This multi-material, multi-scale 3D printing approach provides a promising strategy for engineering advanced composite constructs for the regeneration of musculoskeletal and connective tissue interfaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.