Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917824›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Identifying maintenance hosts for infection with Dichelobacter nodosus in free-ranging wild ruminants in Switzerland: A prevalence study.

Gaia Moore-Jones, Flurin Ardüser, Salome Dürr, Stefanie Gobeli Brawand, Adrian Steiner, Patrik Zanolari, Marie-Pierre Ryser-Degiorgis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid serogroup classification of the footrot pathogenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gaia Moore-JonesCentre for Fish and Wildlife Health, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Flurin ArdüserClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Salome DürrVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Liebefeld, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7321-5980
Stefanie Gobeli BrawandInstitute of Veterinary Bacteriology, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Adrian SteinerClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Patrik ZanolariClinic for Ruminants, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Marie-Pierre Ryser-DegiorgisCentre for Fish and Wildlife Health, Vetsuisse-Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1062-870X
University of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Footrot is a worldwide economically important, painful, contagious bacterial foot disease of domestic and wild ungulates caused by Dichelobacter nodosus. Benign and virulent strains have been identified in sheep presenting with mild and severe lesions, respectively. However, in Alpine ibex (Capra ibex ibex), both strains have been associated with severe lesions. Because the disease is widespread throughout sheep flocks in Switzerland, a nationwide footrot control program for sheep focusing on virulent strains shall soon be implemented. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to estimate the nationwide prevalence of both strain groups of D. nodosus in four wild indigenous ruminant species and to identify potential susceptible wildlife maintenance hosts that could be a reinfection source for domestic sheep. During two years (2017-2018), interdigital swabs of 1,821 wild indigenous ruminant species (Alpine ibex, Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), red deer (Cervus elaphus)) were analysed by Real-Time PCR. Furthermore, observed interspecies interactions were documented for each sample. Overall, we report a low prevalence of D. nodosus in all four indigenous wild ruminants, for both benign (1.97%, N = 36, of which 31 red deer) and virulent (0.05%, N = 1 ibex) strains. Footrot lesions were documented in one ibex with virulent strains, and in one ibex with benign strains. Interspecific interactions involving domestic livestock occurred mainly with cattle and sheep. In conclusion, the data suggest that wild ungulates are likely irrelevant for the maintenance and spread of D. nodosus. Furthermore, we add evidence that both D. nodosus strain types can be associated with severe disease in Alpine ibex. These data are crucial for the upcoming nationwide control program and reveal that wild ruminants should not be considered as a threat to footrot control in sheep in this context.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDeerDichelobacter nodosusEpidemiological MonitoringFoot RotGoatsPrevalenceRupicapraSheepSheep DiseasesSwitzerland

Identifiers

PMID31917824
PMCPMC6952115
OpenAlexW2999655191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.