ReviewPLoS medicine2020
Infectious disease pandemic planning and response: Incorporating decision analysis.
Review in PLoS medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Potential Scenarios and Hazards in the Work of the Future: A Systematic Review of the Peer-Reviewed and Gray Literatures.Annals of work exposures and health · 2020Pooled it
- Key questions for modelling COVID-19 exit strategies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Pooled it
- Model-guided geospatial surveillance system for antimalarial drug resistance.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
- How understanding the diversity of perspectives and systems in governments can increase the impact of scientific research.Communications health · 2026Review
- Optimal algorithms for controlling infectious diseases in real time using noisy infection data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Potential benefits of adaptive control strategies are outweighed by costs of infrequent, but dramatically larger disease outbreaks.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Assessing bias in susceptible-infected-recovered estimation from aggregated epidemic data.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Empowering Healthcare Agility: A Strategic Framework for Pandemic-Responsive Operational Planning.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2025Article
- Asymmetric limits on timely interventions from noisy epidemic data.Communications physics · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis of non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination on Ebolavirus disease outbreak: Stochastic modeling approach.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2024Article
- Ethical frameworks should be applied to computational modelling of infectious disease interventions.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Having a real say: findings from first nations community panels on pandemic influenza vaccine distribution.BMC public health · 2023Article
- Rapid prototyping of models for COVID-19 outbreak detection in workplaces.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Forecasting COVID-19 activity in Australia to support pandemic response: May to October 2020.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Computational decision-support tools for urban design to improve resilience against COVID-19 and other infectious diseases: A systematic review.Progress in planning · 2023Article
- Context-dependent representation of within- and between-model uncertainty: aggregating probabilistic predictions in infectious disease epidemiology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Article
- When might host heterogeneity drive the evolution of asymptomatic, pandemic coronaviruses?Nonlinear dynamics · 2023Article
- Experiencing the COVID-19 Emergency: Age-Related Disequilibrating Event for Identity.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Assessing gender responsiveness of COVID-19 response plans for populations in conflict-affected humanitarian emergencies.Conflict and health · 2022Article
- Spatial variability of COVID-19 and its risk factors in Nigeria: A spatial regression method.Applied geography (Sevenoaks, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Freya Shearer and co-authors discuss the use of decision analysis in planning for infectious disease pandemics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.