Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917373›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2020

Correlates of Successful Enrollment of Same-Sex Male Couples Into a Web-Based HIV Prevention Research Study: Cross-Sectional Study.

Rob Stephenson, Tanaka Md Chavanduka, Stephen Sullivan, Jason W Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rob StephensonThe Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9239-2640
Tanaka Md ChavandukaThe Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0167-3867
Stephen SullivanThe Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-4812-2579
Jason W MitchellOffice of Public Health Studies, Myron B Thompson School of Social Work, University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0840-9404
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa · US

Funding

Hierarchical Influences on PrEP use, willingness and readiness among male couplesR21MH111445 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MITCHELL, JASON W, STEPHENSON, ROB B. · 2016 to 2017
$422k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH111445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe recognition of the role of primary partners in HIV transmission has led to a growth in dyadic-focused HIV prevention efforts. The increasing focus on male couples in HIV research has been paralleled by an increase in the development of interventions aimed at reducing HIV risk behaviors among male couples. The ability to accurately assess the efficacy of these interventions rests on the ability to successfully enroll couples into HIV prevention research.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore factors associated with successful dyadic engagement in Web-based HIV prevention research using recruitment and enrollment data from a large sample of same-sex male couples recruited online from the United States.

methodsData came from a large convenience sample of same-sex male couples in the United States, who were recruited through social media venues for a Web-based, mixed method HIV prevention research study. The analysis examined the demographic factors associated with successful dyadic engagement in research, measured as both members of the dyad meeting eligibility criteria, consenting for the study, and completing all study processes.

resultsAdvertisements generated 221,258 impressions, resulting in 4589 clicks. Of the 4589 clicks, 3826 individuals were assessed for eligibility, of which 1076 individuals (538/1913, 28.12% couples) met eligibility criteria and were included in the study. Of the remaining 2740 ineligible participants, 1293/3826 (33.80%) were unlinked because their partner did not screen for eligibility, 48/2740 (1.75%) had incomplete partner data because at least one partner did not finish the survey, 22/2740 (0.80%) were ineligible because of 1 partner not meeting the eligibility criteria. Furthermore, 492/3826 (12.86%) individuals were fraudulent. The likelihood of being in a matched couple varied significantly by race and ethnicity, region, and relationship type. Men from the Midwest were less likely to have a partner who did not complete the survey. Men with college education and those who labeled their relationships as husband or other (vs boyfriend) were more likely to have a partner who did not complete the survey.

conclusionsThe processes used allowed couples to independently progress through the stages necessary to enroll in the research study, while limiting opportunities for coercion, and resulted in a large sample with relative diversity in demographic characteristics. The results underscore the need for additional considerations when recruiting and enrolling, relative to improving the methods associated with these research processes.

Indexed as

InternetPatient SelectionAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSexual PartnersSocioeconomic FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung Adultcouplesdyadiconline researchrecruitment

Identifiers

PMID31917373
PMCPMC6996732
OpenAlexW2984314721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.