Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917369›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm2020

Stellate ganglion stimulation causes spatiotemporal changes in ventricular repolarization in pig.

Veronique M F Meijborg, Bastiaan J D Boukens, Michiel J Janse, Siamak Salavatian, Michael J Dacey, Koji Yoshie, Tobias Opthof, Mohammed Amer Swid, Jonathan D Hoang, Peter Hanna and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Autonomic modulation of ventricular electrical activity: recent developments and clinical implications.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Veronique M F MeijborgDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Netherlands Heart Institute, Holland Heart House, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bastiaan J D BoukensDepartment of Medical Biology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel J JanseDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Siamak SalavatianUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Michael J DaceyUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Koji YoshieUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Tobias OpthofDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mohammed Amer SwidUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Jonathan D HoangUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Peter HannaUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Jeffrey ArdellUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Kalyanam ShivkumarUCLA Cardiac Arrhythmia Center, Los Angeles, California.
Ruben CoronelDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Heart Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; L'Institut de RYthmologie et de modélisation Cardiaque (LIRYC), Université Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France. Electronic address: rubencoronel@gmail.com.
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia · USUniversity of Amsterdam · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLElectrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute · FRNetherlands Heart Institute · NL

Funding

Comprehensive Structural and Functional Mapping of the Mammalian Cardiac Nervous SystemOT2OD023848 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI EFIMOV, IGOR R, FOWLKES, CHARLESS · 2016 to 2021
$21.4M
CARDIOVASCULAR SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32HL007895 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI SHIVKUMAR, KALYANAM, WATSON, KAROL E · 1998 to 2023
$9.2M
Bioelectric monitoring and control of the heartU01EB025138 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARDELL, JEFFREY L, KIPKE, DARYL R · 2017 to 2020
$4.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007895NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB025138NIH HHS OT2 OD023848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDispersion in ventricular repolarization is relevant for arrhythmogenesis.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to determine the spatiotemporal effects of sympathetic stimulation on ventricular repolarization.

methodsIn 5 anesthetized female open-chest pigs, ventricular repolarization was measured from the anterior, lateral, and posterior walls of the left ventricle (LV) and right ventricle using up to 40 transmural plunge needles (4 electrodes each) before and after left stellate ganglion stimulation (LSGS) and right stellate ganglion stimulation. In addition, LSGS was performed in 3 pigs (2 male, 1 female) before and after verapamil (5-10 mg/h) administration.

resultsLSGS yielded a biphasic response in repolarization in the lateral and posterior walls of the LV, with prolongation at ∼5 seconds (10 ± 1.5 ms) and shortening at 20-30 seconds of stimulation (-28.9 ± 4.4 ms) during a monotonic pressure increase. While the initial prolongation was abolished by verapamil, late shortening was augmented. Sequential transections of the vagal nerve and stellate ganglia augmented repolarization dispersion responses to LSGS in 2 of 5 hearts. An equal pressure increase by aortic occlusion resulted in a homogeneous shortening of repolarization in the LV, and the effects were smaller than those during LSGS. Right stellate stimulation shortened repolarization mainly in the anterior LV wall, but the effects were smaller than those of LSGS.

conclusionLSGS first prolongs (through the L-type calcium current) and then shortens repolarization. The effect of LSGS was prominent in the posterior and lateral, not the anterior, LV walls.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalElectric StimulationFemaleHeart Conduction SystemHeart RateHeart VentriclesMalePrognosisStellate GanglionSwineTachycardia, VentricularVentricular Function, LeftAutonomic nervous systemHeterogeneityRepolarizationStellate ganglionT-wave

Identifiers

PMID31917369
PMCPMC7196037
OpenAlexW2997372419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.