Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31917325›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2020

Functional brain network architecture supporting the learning of social networks in humans.

Steven H Tompson, Ari E Kahn, Emily B Falk, Jean M Vettel, Danielle S Bassett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Interactions between neural representations of the social and spatial environment.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Optimizing the human learnability of abstract network representations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. From calcium imaging to graph topology.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2022
    Review
  17. Impact of exogenous estradiol on task-based and resting-state neural signature during and after fear extinction in healthy women.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Article
  18. Cognitive maps of social features enable flexible inference in social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. The growth and form of knowledge networks by kinesthetic curiosity.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Steven H TompsonHuman Sciences Campaign, U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Center Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Ari E KahnDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Emily B FalkAnnenberg School of Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Marketing Department, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Jean M VettelHuman Sciences Campaign, U.S. Combat Capabilities Development Center Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen, MD, 21005, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA.
Danielle S BassettDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Santa Fe Institute, Santa Fe, NM, 87501, USA. Electronic address: dsb@seas.upenn.edu.
University of Pennsylvania · USDEVCOM Army Research Laboratory · USSanta Fe Institute · USUniversity of California, Santa Barbara · US

Funding

Longitudinal Mapping of Network Development Underlying Executive Dysfunction in AdolescenceR01MH113550 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Danielle Smith Bassett, Theodore Satterthwaite · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
Inter-modal Coupling Image AnalyticsR01MH112847 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Theodore Satterthwaite, Russell Takeshi Shinohara · 2017 to 2026
$5.9M
Evolution of the Linked Architecture of Network Control and Executive Function in AdolescenceR21MH106799 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH, SATTERTHWAITE, THEODORE · 2016 to 2017
$515k
Development and validation of a computational model of higher-order statistical learning on graphs in humansR21MH124121 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI BASSETT, DANIELLE SMITH · 2020 to 2020
$431k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112847NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH113550NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH106799NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH124121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most humans have the good fortune to live their lives embedded in richly structured social groups. Yet, it remains unclear how humans acquire knowledge about these social structures to successfully navigate social relationships. Here we address this knowledge gap with an interdisciplinary neuroimaging study drawing on recent advances in network science and statistical learning. Specifically, we collected BOLD MRI data while participants learned the community structure of both social and non-social networks, in order to examine whether the learning of these two types of networks was differentially associated with functional brain network topology. We found that participants learned the community structure of the networks, as evidenced by a slower reaction time when a trial moved between communities than when a trial moved within a community. Learning the community structure of social networks was also characterized by significantly greater functional connectivity of the hippocampus and temporoparietal junction when transitioning between communities than when transitioning within a community. Furthermore, temporoparietal regions of the default mode were more strongly connected to hippocampus, somatomotor, and visual regions for social networks than for non-social networks. Collectively, our results identify neurophysiological underpinnings of social versus non-social network learning, extending our knowledge about the impact of social context on learning processes. More broadly, this work offers an empirical approach to study the learning of social network structures, which could be fruitfully extended to other participant populations, various graph architectures, and a diversity of social contexts in future studies.

Indexed as

ConnectomeSocial CognitionSocial NetworkingAdultAssociation LearningCerebral CortexFemaleHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetPattern Recognition, VisualProbability LearningYoung AdultFunctional brain networksSocial cognitionSocial network learningStatistical learning

Identifiers

PMID31917325
PMCPMC8740914
OpenAlexW2999726254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.